The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 05, 2010, 11:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
It's pretty much the same for both codes as your original "Brain Teaser" except now you've thrown an illegal bat into the picture. It's a bat because an airborne player cannot complete a catch, therefore if he intentionally propels the ball in some direction, he has batted it. And an offensive player may not bat a backward pass forward 1) at all in NFHS or, 2) in an attempt to gain yardage in NCAA.
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 05, 2010, 11:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L View Post
It's pretty much the same for both codes as your original "Brain Teaser" except now you've thrown an illegal bat into the picture. It's a bat because an airborne player cannot complete a catch, therefore if he intentionally propels the ball in some direction, he has batted it. And an offensive player may not bat a backward pass forward 1) at all in NFHS or, 2) in an attempt to gain yardage in NCAA.
Another difference is that 88 is not fielding a forward pass, which was part of what was illegal in the first sitch.

You sure this fits the definition of BAT in the two rule codes you mention? And what about NFL to those that work that code.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 05, 2010, 12:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Another difference is that 88 is not fielding a forward pass, which was part of what was illegal in the first sitch.

You sure this fits the definition of BAT in the two rule codes you mention? And what about NFL to those that work that code.
True, eligibility would not be lost per NCAA since it's backward, so that particular foul could not be called, but the others could as before along with the illegal bat.

As for the definition of bat, it's clear per NCAA "striking it or changing direction with hands or arms". NFHS, not so clear, but I don't know what else you could call it. I believe we discussed this type play, only it was a legal forward pass to a legal airborne receiver who tossed it forward to another rec'r, in one of our meetings a while ago and our rule interp guy came up with batting but because it was a legal forward to legal rec'r who never completed a catch, there was no foul.
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem

Last edited by Mike L; Thu Aug 05, 2010 at 12:18pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brain teaser MD Longhorn Football 154 Wed Aug 18, 2010 09:55am
just a brain teaser cmathews Football 6 Tue Sep 16, 2008 05:53am
brain teaser Andy Softball 14 Sun Oct 21, 2007 07:26pm
Brain Teaser question David Emerling Softball 43 Tue Sep 04, 2007 09:42pm
Brain teaser. Mike Simonds Football 4 Tue Jul 22, 2003 01:34pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1