The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 07, 2010, 11:36am
jjb jjb is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
NFHS - horse collar rule question

on a running play A1 is being horse collared at B's 40 yard line and the ball comes loose. The ball is recovered by:
A2 on B's 35
A2 on B's 45
B1 on B's 35
B1 on B's 45

Where is the enforcement spot ?

( I'm new here and my chapter didn't hand the rules/case booklets out yet )

Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 07, 2010, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 175
the basic spot for all of these is the end of the run (B40) which you beanbagged when the ball came out. In all scenarios, the spot of enforcement is the B40. A keeps the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 08, 2010, 03:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bend, WI
Posts: 336
Correct me if I'm wrong....and I'm sure someone will if I'm not reading you right.

Am I right in assuming that the ball carrier was taken down after loss of posession..? I.E.:the ball came out in the process of the HC tackle and the foul was completed after the loss of posession by the runner....?

If the runner is not down yet via tackle by horse collar...now the ball comes out and there's a live ball fumble...if he's not taken down to the ground by the HC...there's no foul. The act of the horse collar foul isn't complete until the runner is taken down by the action....now revised to be forward, sideways, or backwards....per the new ruling once the tackler is inside the back or sides of the collar or pads. If the ball comes out prior to the runner being down, there's got to be a foul for something other than the horse collar (PF/unnecessary roughness as the runner is no longer a runner due to loss of posession) or no foul if the runner (or former runner after loss of posession) is not taken to the ground by the act of the HC tackle. We discussed this a while back regarding a HC tackle while crossing the goalline and whether the runner is still a runner because the play is dead once the ball crosses the goal line and whether it's a dead ball PF or still considered an HC..

If someone is hanging on by the inside of the jersey collar or shoulder pads and slips off, or the runner isn't taken down, or finished off by a player (B2)....there should be no foul.

9-4-3k:
"No Player or Nonplayer Shall: Grab the inside back or side collar of the shoulder pads or jersey of the runner and subsequently pull that opponent to the ground."


I'd like to see some other replies here....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 08, 2010, 03:35pm
Chain of Fools
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
if he's not taken down to the ground by the HC...there's no foul.
Correct

Quote:
If the ball comes out prior to the runner being down, there's got to be a foul for something other than the horse collar (PF/unnecessary roughness as the runner is no longer a runner due to loss of posession)
Incorrect- this is what the change addressed for 2010. Wording was changed to "opponent".

Quote:
We discussed this a while back regarding a HC tackle while crossing the goalline and whether the runner is still a runner because the play is dead once the ball crosses the goal line and whether it's a dead ball PF or still considered an HC..
Last year's debate, rule change clarifies this to be a HC foul for 2010.

See pg. 89-90 in rules book for the commentary on 2010 rules changes. It gives a pretty clear and concise answer to this topic.

Last edited by HLin NC; Sun Aug 08, 2010 at 03:48pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 08, 2010, 03:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bend, WI
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by HLin NC View Post
Correct


Incorrect- this is what the change addressed for 2010. Wording was changed to "opponent".

Last year's debate, rule change clarifies this to be a HC foul for 2010.
My bad...I misprinted the opponent term in #2 and realized after I had sent it.

Thanks for the clarity. I would've liked an exact point where/when the foul occurred and where/when the runner lost posession, and probably should've asked for some more info prior to commenting.

Regards.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 08, 2010, 04:13pm
Chain of Fools
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
.now revised to be forward, sideways, or backwards..
I don't think forward is considered HC either.

Case Book-
*9.4.3 SITUATION L: A1 is running in the open field and B1 grabs A1's shoulder pad opening from behind and: (a) pulls A1 down abruptly backwards; (b) pulls A1 down to the ground from the side; (c) rides A1 for several yards before pulling A1 backwards to the ground; or (d) rides A1 for several yards before A1 falls forward. RULING: Illegal horse-collar foul in (a), (b) and (c), legal in (d).
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 08, 2010, 09:51pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by HLin NC View Post
I don't think forward is considered HC either.

Case Book-
*9.4.3 SITUATION L: A1 is running in the open field and B1 grabs A1's shoulder pad opening from behind and: (a) pulls A1 down abruptly backwards; (b) pulls A1 down to the ground from the side; (c) rides A1 for several yards before pulling A1 backwards to the ground; or (d) rides A1 for several yards before A1 falls forward. RULING: Illegal horse-collar foul in (a), (b) and (c), legal in (d).
I am assuming that is in the 2010 Casebook right?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 08, 2010, 10:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I am assuming that is in the 2010 Casebook right?

Peace
Correct. 2010 Casebook, Page 73.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 08, 2010, 10:26pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnref View Post
Correct. 2010 Casebook, Page 73.
Thanks, I do not have a copy yet.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Horse Collar or Not? babrown Football 15 Thu Oct 29, 2009 01:20pm
Horse Collar Rule NCAA vs. FED Ref Ump Welsch Football 5 Sat Oct 10, 2009 04:56pm
9-4-3k Horse collar phansen Football 43 Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:49am
horse collar phansen Football 3 Tue Nov 18, 2008 02:57pm
Horse collar secondregionbug Football 19 Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:00pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1