The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 21, 2010, 03:11pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
New Testing Process

To make a long story short, my state just went to a new testing process. Because of not being a full member of the NF, our state produced their own test.

The football version of this testing came out yesterday. We have to answer only 25 questions, but instead of testing on whether you understand what a word means in an obscure rule, we actually answer plays and decide what the process is after a play is over. Also the test is multiple choice instead of true/false.

What do you think and what do states do that create their own test separate from the NF.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 21, 2010, 06:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 22
In Georgia they give us the NFHS part 1 test. The state creates their own Mechanics test and Part 2 test (the Part 2 test is closed-book and proctered), each of which is 50 questions and T/F.
__________________
I'm not getting older...these high school kids just keep getting younger and younger
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 21, 2010, 10:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 254
Send a message via Yahoo to umpirebob71
Wow, in Ohio, once we get our Class1 license, we never have to take another test.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 22, 2010, 08:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpirebob71 View Post
Wow, in Ohio, once we get our Class1 license, we never have to take another test.
In my experience, our officiating reflects this fact.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 22, 2010, 10:50am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
In my experience, our officiating reflects this fact.
I have never been convinced that testing enhances rules knowledge. Most of my rules knowledge comes from discussions or association meetings (outside of my personal study of course) than any rules test has ever done. And the one reason I love our current testing at this time is the fact that they are not asking us things like the diameter of the football, but rather when you have a penalty what is the down and distance. I would think that officials in your area are not holding individuals accountable for knowing the rules like the crews I have been on do. We constantly talk rules and situations throughout the season or off season.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 22, 2010, 04:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Watertown, SD
Posts: 56
Send a message via Skype™ to jemiller
Testing

In South Dakota they had an early multiple choice test that did nothing to advance training in my opinion. After the uproar ended, and the testing outfit that was used went belly up, we went back to the regular paper and pencil 100 T F open book and closed book test.

Now we do the same test, but on-line. Same for mechanics. We get the test down loaded so that we can review as a group, and this we had always done. Last year was our first year under that system, and despite a couple of glitches with the mechanics test, and instructions over how to do things the first time, I think it was great.

We have reduced the costs to the association and members. Not sure why our annual fees went up given all of these cost savings measures, but they were probably due to increase regardless. Now if we could only get a central assigning software solution to fly so that officiating crews don't have to pass each other going to do games in each others backyard we would be set.

30+ years of handling FB contracts is wearing thin...Jim
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 02:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Speak for yourself. I happen to think that the officiating in my association is spot on.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 23, 2010, 04:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
I think 25 questions is too little... but other than that I agree that a homemade test is going to be better than questions regarding what words can be on the football, what equipment can be carried by a non-player who is authorized to be on the sideline, what materials a chain should be made of, and trying to decipher a triple negative with missing commas and figure out what they meant.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 28, 2010, 12:02am
ODJ ODJ is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
In my experience, our officiating reflects this fact.
I thought you guys had standards.

Regards, LBJ
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 22, 2010, 10:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
To make a long story short, my state just went to a new testing process. Because of not being a full member of the NF, our state produced their own test.

The football version of this testing came out yesterday. We have to answer only 25 questions, but instead of testing on whether you understand what a word means in an obscure rule, we actually answer plays and decide what the process is after a play is over. Also the test is multiple choice instead of true/false.

What do you think and what do states do that create their own test separate from the NF.

Peace
I like it.
__________________
Every game is a big game
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASA rules change process - is it broken? Dakota Softball 19 Thu Apr 19, 2007 01:21pm
Playoff selection process grantsrc Football 3 Sun Nov 13, 2005 08:38pm
Ideas for setting up an evaluation process Geek Basketball 10 Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:07pm
HL thought process tempestos Football 7 Thu Sep 25, 2003 07:11am
FED Appeal Process PeteBooth Baseball 13 Thu Dec 07, 2000 09:10am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1