TD + Block in the back + USC

[LDUB]

Originally Posted by mbyron

You should not call a "normal" BIB this far away from the play. A "normal" BIB so far from the runner provides no advantage. Flag as a PF if you judge that the contact is severe, otherwise talk to the kid.

The contact doesn't have to be severe to be a foul.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by LDUB

The contact doesn't have to be severe to be a foul.

Yes it does.

[LDUB]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Yes it does.

Do you have some sort of reference for that?

It doesn't take severe contact to knock someone to the ground when they are not expecting to be hit.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by LDUB

Do you have some sort of reference for that?

It doesn't take severe contact to knock someone to the ground when they are not expecting to be hit.

If they're knocked to the ground, IMO that's severe.

[ML99]

thanks for your feedback ! After I read your comments - the correct enforcement makes sense to me.

[yankeesfan]

so no matter what order those 2 fouls occured, is it correct that you will enforce the block in the back first? nfhs rules.

[bossman72]

Originally Posted by yankeesfan

so no matter what order those 2 fouls occured, is it correct that you will enforce the block in the back first? nfhs rules.

Yes, because the BIB is a live ball foul. Dead ball fouls are enforced after live ball fouls.