The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 30, 2009, 08:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lindenhurst, IL
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by stegenref View Post
What is the FED site? Is it similar to this one?
NFHS Forum: Football
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 30, 2009, 09:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lindenhurst, IL
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
The tackler flipped the runner over, but he did not have the "top-down" leverage required to drive him head-first into the ground. The tackler ended underneath the runner.
As a wrestling official (and an ex-wrestler who has been thrown like this many times), I can tell you that "top-down" leverage is not required to actually create significant head-first force into the ground. Where the tackler ended in relation to the runner has little to no bearing on whether or not there was an acceleration down towards the ground and significant risk of head and/or neck injury. By popping his hips up during the throw, I can assure you that plenty of leverage/downward force was created. If you don't believe me, head to a local wrestling practice in November and ask somebody to suplay or salto you. There is a reason throws like this are illegal under NFHS wrestling rules.

The play was over when the defender popped his hips and created the downward acceleration. The forward progress had been stopped. The runner was no longer in contact with the ground. This is akin to a defender catching an airborne receiver, driving him back, and then intentionally depositing him on his head at the whistle. The fact that it was all part of a continuous action leads me to believe that I'd give the defender the benefit of the doubt that the act was not intentional and pass on any foul.

However, I don't thing it is as cut and dry of a no-call as most.

Last edited by InsideTheStripe; Wed Sep 30, 2009 at 09:26am. Reason: Cleaining up punctuation
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 30, 2009, 01:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ste. Genevieve, MO
Posts: 68
this forum vs. nfhs

Quote:
Originally Posted by InsideTheStripe View Post
Do you guys patronize both this forum and that NFHS forum or do most people look at just one or the other? Which one is better and why?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 30, 2009, 02:34pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
I post on several. This one, the NFHS forum and Refstripes.com. There are a few others for baseball and what not but I am a bit of a forum junkie.

I've recently moved to Texas (which uses NCAA rules in football) so I probably won't post much in the football section anymore but I just started basketball and I work baseball so I won't drop off of there completely.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 30, 2009, 02:46pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,609
I would say that the NF website for football is probably better. But that is mostly because year-round more officials and coaches frequent that board. There are more detailed discussions on the football side of things. The basketball board is another example of how bad it is on the NF board. Not many conversations or people attend that site. I do not think the issue is which is better? I think the issue is what serves your needs. Both serve my needs to discuss officiating. I am on a couple of other boards that are not quite officiating sites from time to time as well. It is not really that big of deal, I am often trying to pass the time between activities.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tackle of non-ball carrier BigGref Football 3 Sun Sep 07, 2008 08:52pm
Hard tackle wardtc Soccer 1 Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:59am
Tackle Eligible coachlaratta Football 20 Mon Nov 13, 2006 02:26pm
Sliding Tackle Ed Hickland Football 3 Tue Oct 26, 2004 11:23am
Tackle Eligible??? stevesmith Football 15 Mon Sep 13, 2004 02:57pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1