The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 24, 2009, 02:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Take a deep breath Robert, there is a definition for the word disconcerting. The point is that it has been decided that it is the covering official's judgement ALONE as to what constitutes disconcerting. Leaving such decisions in the hands of game officials has worked exceedingly well for over 100 years.

The ambiguity built into those decisions is largely based on experience with the soundness, impartiality and rationality of judgments made by game officials over the decades. Since it clearly isn't broke, there's really no need to tinker trying to fix anything.

Whenever a team, or a player, chooses to make some sort of signal, sound or otherwise indication that could reasonably be judged to be a disconcerting factor, they would be well advised to abandon that device for something that doesn't offer multiple interpretations. What we do isn't rocket science nor should we try and over complicate it. When a team, or player, insists on doing or saying something that can be interpreted different ways, they assume the risk of possible misinterpretation.

Last edited by ajmc; Thu Sep 24, 2009 at 02:11pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 24, 2009, 11:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
Whenever a team, or a player, chooses to make some sort of signal, sound or otherwise indication that could reasonably be judged to be a disconcerting factor, they would be well advised to abandon that device for something that doesn't offer multiple interpretations.
Another example of why officials should have coaching experience. You don't make up new signals during a game. If each team has prearranged the same signal word, something's got to give. I don't see why this should be any more controversial than having the teams wear contrasting colors.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 25, 2009, 10:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Another example of why officials should have coaching experience. You don't make up new signals during a game. If each team has prearranged the same signal word, something's got to give. I don't see why this should be any more controversial than having the teams wear contrasting colors.

Robert
I agree with you 100%. Even more critical though is I think young coaches should get their officials license and work some junior high or freshman games. Many officials have played or coached. Most coaches have never officiated.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 25, 2009, 11:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by bisonlj View Post
I agree with you 100%. Even more critical though is I think young coaches should get their officials license and work some junior high or freshman games. Many officials have played or coached. Most coaches have never officiated.
Why only young coaches? Why does it matter if the first year coach is 25 or 45?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
defensive steal palmettoref Basketball 25 Thu Oct 26, 2006 07:15pm
Defensive matchup Rev.Ref63 Basketball 4 Thu Nov 17, 2005 04:53am
Defensive Holding/Illegal block Jaysef Football 6 Thu Sep 15, 2005 04:37pm
Defensive Jab theboys Basketball 17 Wed May 18, 2005 09:08am
Defensive conference in OBR? bigwes68 Baseball 15 Mon Jun 21, 2004 08:13pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1