The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 28, 2009, 12:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
In this case, there is no "act," and so no foul by A. The omission of an act (a snap) does not itself constitute an act "clearly intended to cause B to encroach."

The rule is intended to penalize a QB's head bob with hard count, a sudden jump off the line by a wing going in motion, and other such acts (of commission).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 28, 2009, 08:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 769
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
The rule is intended to penalize a QB's head bob with hard count, a sudden jump off the line by a wing going in motion, and other such acts (of commission).
Spot on with this answer.
__________________
Some people are like Slinkies...
Not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 28, 2009, 08:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mregor View Post
Quote:
The rule is intended to penalize a QB's head bob with hard count, a sudden jump off the line by a wing going in motion, and other such acts (of commission).
Spot on with this answer.
No, not so spot on. Other provisions of Fed's or of NCAA's false start provisions would at least outlaw the head bob, and probably the sudden jump start (have to see it). Fed seems to have purposely adopted an open-ended wording that's sure to lead to disagreements. What if a player of A pretends to be watching a BJ's signals or play clock and yells, "Pass the ball now!"? How about, "Darn! Every time I get into 3-point, my nose itches. Would you mind scratching it for me?"

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 29, 2009, 12:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
No, not so spot on. Other provisions of Fed's or of NCAA's false start provisions would at least outlaw the head bob, and probably the sudden jump start (have to see it). Fed seems to have purposely adopted an open-ended wording that's sure to lead to disagreements. What if a player of A pretends to be watching a BJ's signals or play clock and yells, "Pass the ball now!"? How about, "Darn! Every time I get into 3-point, my nose itches. Would you mind scratching it for me?"

Robert

What the hey?
I need a philosophy of intended action degree.

Last edited by kfo9494; Sat Aug 29, 2009 at 12:09pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 30, 2009, 12:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bend, WI
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by kfo9494 View Post
What the hey?
I need a philosophy of intended action degree.
Yeah..another what the hey.

Pass the ball NOW would be no different than the HC or a player telling the QB to snap the ball quickly due to play clock nearing expiration. Nothing at all there. The part about a player trying to get another one to itch his nose would fall under nothing but maybe taunting or unsportsmanlike, and a simple "knock it off" would take care of that.

Reading a little too into that IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 30, 2009, 06:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canned Heat View Post
The part about a player trying to get another one to itch his nose would fall under nothing but maybe taunting or unsportsmanlike, and a simple "knock it off" would take care of that.
You may want to rephrase that! :-O
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 30, 2009, 08:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bend, WI
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
You may want to rephrase that! :-O
Go ahead...I'll play along.

No, not so spot on. Other provisions of Fed's or of NCAA's false start provisions would at least outlaw the head bob, and probably the sudden jump start (have to see it). Fed seems to have purposely adopted an open-ended wording that's sure to lead to disagreements. What if a player of A pretends to be watching a BJ's signals or play clock and yells, "Pass the ball now!"? How about, "Darn! Every time I get into 3-point, my nose itches. Would you mind scratching it for me?"

Robert


Yeah..another what the hey.

Pass the ball NOW would be no different than the HC or a player telling the QB to snap the ball quickly due to play clock nearing expiration. Nothing at all there. The part about a player trying to get another one to itch his nose would fall under nothing but maybe taunting or unsportsmanlike, and a simple "knock it off" would take care of that.

Reading a little too into that IMO.
Yesterday 12:05pm

What might I want to rephrase...? The "knock it off" part or the nose itching part...?

These are your examples here partner....no one elses.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
False Start BigGref Swimming/Diving 2 Sun Feb 10, 2008 06:05pm
False Start? starman Football 7 Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:03am
False Start? Suudy Football 10 Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:04pm
False start by the QB SD Sports Fan Football 6 Mon Oct 06, 2003 05:18pm
false start rule Jim Black Football 6 Mon Sep 16, 2002 02:44pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1