![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Should a WH be authorized to overrule the calls of the other officials? | |||
Yes. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 19.05% |
No but he should be authorized to change the call. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 21.43% |
Only the calling official should waive off his call. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 59.52% |
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
AJMC/ALinupstateNY - Excuse me, but once is not enough? Now we get re-runs?
For the record I did not ever state, nor did I ever suggest, we took a vote!
Restated, for clarification, I have never taken a vote regarding an ejection, nor have I ever "simply overruled" an official regarding an ejection. 1) In my humble opinion, an ejection should NEVER be taken lightly. 2) If an official feels an act that he flagged warrents an ejection, then the result will be an ejection unless another official(s) can provide the "calling official" with information they may be useful to the "calling official" to assist him in finalizing HIS decision. This process is commonly referred to as- "taking him off the call." For this reason, I bring the entire crew together. For further clarification, if an official were to state "I didn't see it," then such official is no longer part of the discussion as they have no useful information to relay to the "calling official," however, the "I didn't see it official" is still part of the crew and it is imparative that he stay in the huddle so that we (the crew) can break the huddle all on the same page. Why you say? 3) Because, in our state all ejections require a player (or coach) to sit out the next game at the same level! Therefore, all ejections may be appealed. Since our commissioner is part of the review board, he reviews the situation and is part of the decision making process (in conjuction with the state office (who of course reviews the coaches side of the story)) which decides if the appeal will prevail or the ejection stands. Because this IS the process, I have found that is to be extremley important that all members of the crew are aware of the act which warrented the ejection! Why? Simply because the process requires all members of the crew WILL be interviewed regarding the ejection. And, Yes, we have had situations where one official has reported to the commisioner "Yea Bob, I saw it but I didn't think it warrented an ejection!" My policy has worked quite well (100%) in preventing that statement from ever being presented to the commissioner! I can say this as in two of the three times I have implemented it (over the last 11 years) the result was no ejection. Additionally, how our state handles ejection appeals is out of my hands. However, I strongly feel it IS my job as a white hat to get the crew on the same page and to make sure any available information is provided to the "calling official" prior to announcing an ejection has occured. Finally, in my humble opinion, I believe a "reasonable person" would assert, that for an "unreasonable person" to continually lamblast actual on-field football officials with his usual rhetoric of nefarious comments prior to garnering all the facts surrounding a topic, to be way over the line, foolhardy, and a bit askew! ![]()
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber ![]() Last edited by KWH; Thu May 14, 2009 at 01:15pm. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad decisions by players and/or coaches | l3will | Football | 16 | Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:12am |
addressing coaches or players | my3sons | Baseball | 34 | Wed Apr 20, 2005 05:23pm |
Hope he sees this... | Texoma_LJ | Football | 15 | Fri Oct 01, 2004 03:39pm |
Coaches and their players | SOWB_Ref | Basketball | 15 | Fri Feb 08, 2002 10:11am |
Any coaches/players here? | ilya | Basketball | 4 | Fri Apr 06, 2001 12:21am |