Possible rules changes for 2009

[ajmc]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You are accountable to the people here if you make statements (on here) that are incorrect. And if you choose not to answer questions after making very specific claims, then your credibility with people here goes in the toliet.
Peace

Perhaps you could remind me of what, "statements (on here) that are incorrect" I've made that you are referring to. While you're at it, what specific questions, that are within my power to answer, are you seeking guidance on? Questions about why other people may have chosen to do, or not do, something are obviously beyond the reach of my headlights. Perhaps you think your beams shine into the minds of others, sorry mine don't.

I presume that any statements I make here would be scrutinized by anyone who chooses to read them, isn't that what an exchange of perspectives is supposed to be all about. I'm not intending to preaching to anyone, I'm simply stating that certain comments and a certain tone is over the line, and all the empty threats, barking and posturing is not going to bring them back, or move the line.

Why would you think I, or anyone, should expect a pass or anyone should accept a point of view that doesn't merit acceptance based on it's own value? That's not the way things work, usually.

Waltjp, I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think you can actually render a personal attack against a hyena. Although hyenas might not fully understand or agree with that assessment.