Possible rules changes for 2009

[daggo66]

Originally Posted by ajmc

Why it may seem, "you seem to go to some awfully long stretches to excuse/support KB's questionable position" is really very simple. The man has an idea, which I'm pretty confident he believes in, and even though I don't happen to think his idea is all that great, I actually believe it unnecessarily lowers anyone who chooses to attack him personally, with nothing to back up their assertions than speculation and opinions and the opinions of like minded people who seem only interested in their narrow perspective. Simply put, "you don't get to decide, for anyone other than yourself, what the spirit of the rule is". I simply accept the fact, "IT'S NOT MY CALL" and see no vlaue in demonizing a different perception, just because it's different.

Fine, it's different, however we don't like it. We are entitled to that opinion. We are entitled to back up those opinions and assertation.

WHY do you so vehemently defend KB? He has never had a problem voicing his viewpoint on here and he continues to post testimonials as opposed to direct statments.

You seem to have a very childish problem of not being able to separate attacking someone's words with attacking someone personally. It's not the same thing.