![]() |
|
|
|||
I would like to gather a room full of coaches and ask them two questions:
1. Did you know coaches that football is played by fallible humans and that it is possible that you could lose the biggest game of your career due to an error by one your human players such as them dropping a ball? The heads would nod and wonder why I aksed such a stupid question. 2. Did you know coaches that football is officiating by fallible humans and that it is possible that you could lose the biggest game of your career due to an error by one of the human officials such as them blowing their whistle accidentally? Then shock would set in as the coaches expressed disbelief, anger and starting to imagine the lawsuit that they would have to bring (of course in Canada they would not imagine the lawsuit because here if you spill coffee on yourself you don't get any money...) It is interesting that coaches can understand the answer to the first question but not the second even though the answers are identical and for the same reason! |
|
|||
Quote:
1. Only the officials are adults. 2. Only the officials have had years of training. 3. Only the officials get paid (well, security too). 4. Only the officials are officiating. By that last one I mean that the players are actually playing the game, and if they make mistakes that's part of the game. When officials screw up, that's a disruption of the game.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
Quote:
1. Adults don't make mistakes. (!) 2. All officials have years of training at officiating. (What about the officials who are new!) 3. Getting paid means you don't make mistakes. (I wonder what's wrong with the people I work with at my day job then...) 4. Not even sure what #4 implies. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
There are many factors that go into who wins the game. Sports would be different if the assumption was made that all players will execute perfectly, that the weather will cooperate, that no one will be injured, ... , and that yes officials will work a perfect game. The team tries to ensure that their players play to their potential but there are no guarantees. The players will try not to get injured but their are no guarantees. The home team will try to make the weather or other environmental conditions not a factor (by say shoveling the snow off the field) but their are no guarantees and we have had to play on snow covered fields and it is a factor. And yes the officials will try and work a perfect game but again there are no guarantees. To expect that all the possible factors are "part of the game" EXCEPT that the officials errors are not part of the game but should be expected to be perfect is naive in my opinion. While participants should not necessarily be happy about any of the impacts on the outcome, they should understand that they can happen and not be incessed. Last edited by wwcfoa43; Fri Dec 05, 2008 at 11:20am. |
|
|||
I saw John Madden tell a story about the difference between coaches and officials that has stayed with me. At a pre-season game following Madden's Super Bowl Raiders victory, he showed Jim Tunney, that Super Bowl Referee, his ring.
Tunney questioned why Madden got a ring the size of an ashtray, and he got a commerative wrist watch. Madden replied, "because you didn't care who won". That difference answers a lot of questions, some good, some bad depending on perspective. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mississippi HS Game Protest Upheld | TXMike | Football | 44 | Wed Nov 26, 2008 08:29pm |
protest game- nba- old one | lpbreeze | Basketball | 2 | Sat Jan 12, 2008 09:24am |
California State Championship Game | jonwill57 | Basketball | 5 | Sat Mar 31, 2007 01:34am |
California Rules | alabamabluezebra | Football | 2 | Tue Sep 13, 2005 04:17pm |
certification in California | cali girl ref | Basketball | 5 | Wed May 01, 2002 09:15am |