The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 27, 2008, 02:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by refbuz View Post
nah, looks to me like the "bat" came as a result of 2 players jumping on his back in an effort to recover the ball.

I think a case could made either way to support a call/no call.
My name obviously gives away my loyalties. However, I would be hard pressed to say that this was an obvious illegal batting. If it were called, it could have been justified, but I would think that the majority of officials who saw this play live would have called nothing, and I would agree with them.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 27, 2008, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by jchamp View Post
The QB made a bone-headed play,
No, not at all. The announcer tried to sell that, but it was no different than any other runner's decision, and if it hadn't been for a stellar play to knock the ball (which was being carried on the proper side) away, it could well have been a good run.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 27, 2008, 05:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
I wish we knew someone that was in the replay booth so we could know why it wasn't reviewed and corrected. I guess the booth can't fix this one, right?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 27, 2008, 07:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
No, not at all. The announcer tried to sell that, but it was no different than any other runner's decision, and if it hadn't been for a stellar play to knock the ball (which was being carried on the proper side) away, it could well have been a good run.

Robert
Not only that, the announcers went on how the QB made a decision to run to the side instead of straight ahead. The thing is they have no idea if the QB was told by the coaches to do that. Maybe he was coached to run to the side because they thought he would have a better chance over there.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 08:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by LDUB View Post
Not only that, the announcers went on how the QB made a decision to run to the side instead of straight ahead. The thing is they have no idea if the QB was told by the coaches to do that. Maybe he was coached to run to the side because they thought he would have a better chance over there.
That's possible. There was a lot of profanity and two frightened dogs from where I was watching. Nobody was really concerned about the bat because it wasn't completely, holy-roller obvious.
Maybe he didn't want to risk a dive when the line had been choked, maybe he saw daylight to the right side. That can be talked about for weeks or months. Tressel isn't known for taking many risks, so I can see them thinking that the 3rd & 1 is their last chance to make yardage before having to punt. That can drive you to do a lot of things once you're in the thick.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 09:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by jchamp View Post
...because it wasn't completely, holy-roller obvious.
What a great definition of what makes a foul worth calling. I'm going to use this from now on...
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 10:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
Can't the replay official tell if it was a bat? Is he not allowed to call an obvious bat in this case, when it means the whole game?

Come on guys this is just wrong!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 10:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16
It looked pretty obvious like a bat to me. Are the college batting rules different then NFHS?
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 11:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backjudge79 View Post
It looked pretty obvious like a bat to me. Are the college batting rules different then NFHS?
2008 NCAA® FOOTBALL RULES
RULE 2-8 / DEFINITIONS FR -45
SECTION 10. Fumbling, Muffing, Batting,
Touching or Blocking a Kick
Batting
ARTICLE 3. Batting the ball is intentionally striking it or intentionally
changing its direction with the hands or arms.

RULE 9-3 / CONDUCT OF PLAYERS AND OTHERS SUBJECT TO RULE FR -129
SECTION 4. Batting and Kicking
Batting a Loose Ball
c. No player shall bat other loose balls forward in the field of play or in any
direction if the ball is in the end zone (Rule 2-2-3-a)

PENALTY—15 yards from the basic spot and loss of down if the loss
of down is not in conflict with other rules [S31 and S9]
[Exception: No loss of down if the foul occurs when a legal
scrimmage kick is beyond the neutral zone (Rules 10-2-2-c,
d, e and f)].
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 07:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16
So according to the rules it is ok for B to bat a loose ball backward in the field of play?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 08:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
I thought it was a bat when I saw the play live. But on replay I didn't think so. Someone in this thread said the ball was backhanded, but because one could easily be slow in wrist movement, a player could hit the ball with the back of his hand while trying to recover a rolling ball. And if you're not sure it was intentional, it wasn't.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 11:50pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
It does not look obvious enough to call this a penalty. I was thinking that the player might have batted the ball, but it would be a very hard sell. Do not go looking for stuff to call.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 29, 2008, 04:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
Seems even a Penn State player thinks it was a bat:

From the Centre Daily Times:

Recovery effort

Penn State safety Mark Rubin made the play of the game, if not the season, in Columbus, knocking the ball out of the hands of Ohio State quarterback Terrelle Pryor on a quarterback sneak in the fourth quarter. But if not for linebackers Navorro Bowman and Tyrell Sales, the Buckeyes might have been able to recover the fumble and pin the Nittany Lions in their own territory with a punt.

Bowman, who has forced two fumbles this season, dove on the ball at the Buckeyes’ 38-yard line after a mad scramble.

“I was just trying to slow it down with my eyes and hands and just fall on it,” he said.

Sales knocked Ohio State tailback Chris Wells to the turf, giving Bowman the chance to fall on the ball.

“If he hadn’t done that, there’s no telling who would have got the ball,” Bowman said. “It just comes from awareness, having guys keep the ball alive.”
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 29, 2008, 08:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backjudge79 View Post
So according to the rules it is ok for B to bat a loose ball backward in the field of play?
There were 2 bats when the ball was loose after the fumble. It was a "foreward bat" for PSU #46, and then it was a "backward bat" for PSU #10.

YouTube - Penn State at Ohio State - Fumble recovery

Last edited by FeetBallRef; Wed Oct 29, 2008 at 08:09am.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 29, 2008, 08:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
I'd be willing to bat, I mean bet that when the season is over and PSU has won their BCS game, the player is finally going to come out and say if I had not batted that ball in the OSU game, we'd not have been here to win another championship.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Illegal batting or not? hawk65 Football 2 Sun Sep 14, 2008 05:51pm
Legal or Illegal batting? boboman316 Football 5 Thu Oct 11, 2007 08:03am
Illegal Batting by B in B's end zone biglaz Football 2 Mon Oct 11, 2004 11:05am
Illegal Batting- Safety Tom Hinrichs Football 9 Tue Oct 21, 2003 06:56pm
Illegal Batting? stripes1977 Football 24 Thu Jun 19, 2003 06:04am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1