![]() |
|
|
|||
Canadian Ruling
Canadian Ruling
Perhaps the officials were using Canadian rules. In Canada, only forward passes intended to be thrown from behind the line of scrimmage are dead when they land incomplete. Anything else is a live ball though the pass would still be an offside pass subject to penalty. |
|
|||
OK, I saw this play twice yesterday and I have yet to see it blown dead as a incomplete forward pass.
I watched so many college games yesterday and I can't remember which games I saw it in, but I did see it twice. I think one was the punt at the end of the Ok.St and Missouri game. Missouri was lateraling the ball trying to keep it alive and then one was forward and bounced to the next player. They dropped a flag for a illegal forward pass but they let the action go on and did not rule it a incomplete pass. Has anybody seen this blown dead and called correctly? I don't think I have. |
|
|||
The play took place during a kick. Therefore, it cannot be an illegal forward pass, and would not be blown dead when incomplete (for NFHS, under 4-2-2c). Since a forward lateral is not on the list of things that makes the ball dead during a kickoff, the ball is live.
__________________
Cheers, mb Last edited by mbyron; Mon Oct 13, 2008 at 07:38am. |
|
|||
Quote:
If the ball leaves a players hands voluntarily then it is a either a pass or a hand-off no matter how that play started. If the ball travels in flight prior to touching another player or the ground then it is a pass. If the ball does not travel forward then it is a backward pass. If the ball travels forward then it is a forward pass and can be ruled incomplete. At the college and NFL level they want to let this play go and deal with enforcements of those later just to make sure they get it all right. Letting the play go allows two outcomes. Blowing it dead only allows one whether it was correct or not. |
|
|||
definitions of loose balls
Quote:
I guess you could also say a place kick causes the ball to "leave a player's hand voluntarily" in the sense that he allows a teammate to kick it. I think the game would be better served if "fumble" were defined as an involuntary loss of possession and the voluntary means of transferring possession were defined as such, which would make the intentional fumble impossible, but as it stands right now an intentional fumble is possible. Robert |
|
|||
Under the NFHS code, "Passing" is defined (NF:2.31.1) as, "Passing the ball is throwing a ball that is in player possession. In a pass the ball travels in flight".
A "Fumble" is defined as (NF:2.18) as, "A fumble is the loss of player possession other than handing, passing or legal kick". There should be no rational argument, or confusion, as to whether a player's possession ends deliberately (by throwing), or unintentionally by a fumble. That is a black and white decision that must be made by the covering official. Soccer and Hockey are both fine games and have their own language which neither translates, or relates, to football. The current rules for passing and fumbles are succinct, to the point and clear as written. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Illegal forward pass | FTVMartin | Football | 5 | Fri Sep 12, 2008 07:03am |
Illegal Forward Pass? | BktBallRef | Football | 15 | Wed May 16, 2007 12:45pm |
illegal forward pass | MRD | Football | 2 | Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:10am |
Illegal Forward Pass | MLE | Football | 14 | Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:23pm |
Pass Interference on an Illegal Forward Pass | OverAndBack | Football | 8 | Mon Aug 23, 2004 03:11pm |