![]() |
|
|
|||
It seems the last camera view clearly shows the receiver maintaining control of the ball after hitting the ground until a defender bashes it out of his hands with his helmet. The initial TD call looks to have been correct. The deep official appeared to be in excellect position to see what happened and rule on the play. surprisingly he was over ruled.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
And how would you know about trapped heat in Ontario?
![]() Not sure what the NCAA definition of a catch is but in Fed, which is what Cali plays under, that should have been a TD from the last look. He had possession and was on the ground, defender knocked loose a dead ball. |
|
|||
So I hooked my laptop up to my 46" TV.
I can see the video a lot better now. I have a TD. The receiver survived the contact with the ground, therefore touchdown, with Canadian philosophy. The act that caused the ball to dislodge was the helmet of a B player. Since this act was after the player surviving contact with the ground, it's effect on possession is irrelevant.
__________________
Pope Francis |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BU help PU with catch/no catch in infield? | Angler | Softball | 4 | Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:20am |
Catch or no Catch | ref49873 | Football | 9 | Tue Sep 19, 2006 12:25pm |
Catch/No catch? | seeleather | Football | 21 | Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:16pm |
Catch or no catch(foul ball)? | illiniwek8 | Baseball | 2 | Sat Mar 25, 2006 07:16pm |
To catch, or not to catch; the coin, that is... | chiefgil | Football | 13 | Wed Aug 11, 2004 06:40am |