![]() |
|
|||
Clarify the Spot of Enforcement
![]() Watched this one last night with a Varsity crew. NFHS Rules. LOS is A 30-yd line A 2nd down 7 to go; A10 takes snap and rolls out; A79 is flagged for hold behind LOS, about 4-yds behind LOS during A10's roll out; A10 throws legal forward pass to A88 (complete); A88 runs for about 10-yds after catching pass to B 30-yd line; Crew marched off 10-yd penalty from PS and replayed the down 2nd and 17-yds to go. We discussed basic spot, since the roll out preceeded the pass, the run was part of a loose ball play, the basic spot would be the previous spot. The foul would not be assessed from the spot of the foul to make it 2nd and 21-yds to go. Anybody want to weigh in on this one? |
|
|||
Quote:
This is the one in the all-but-one. The basic spot is the 30. The spot of the foul is the 26. Ten yards back to the 16 and replay the down. Second and 21. Any foul by the team in possession behind the basic spot is enforced from the spot of the foul, in this case A's 26. |
|
|||
Varsity Guys Kicked it Then
My take on this, and we thought they kicked it at the time, and now I'm sure they did.
Penalty should have been enforced from spot of the foul. Under all-but-one principle. The basic spot was preceding spot because the run prior to the pass was part of the loose ball play, however, since the foul was behind the basic spot, enforce from the spot of the foul. Should have been 2nd and 21 from the 16. Thanks guys, comments much appreciated. ![]() |
|
|||
Canadian Points of Enforcement:
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
[QUOTE=JugglingReferee]Canadian Points of Enforcement:
Scrimmage Plays
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
There used to be a section of the Football Canada & CFL rule books titled "Fouls and Legal Gains" setting out the enforcement points (spots) for live ball fouls. (In other words, showing that advances of the ball made legally before a foul could be "kept" before enforcement.) They used the "3 and 1" or "all but one" principle just like USAn rules to enforce from PBD (you didn't have EOR) or POF; PBH was looking rather moribund as an enforcement spot. Now, going by what you laid out, it looks like a big gain (or loss) that doesn't result in a 1st down can be completely wiped out by a subsequent foul by either team if the penalty is accepted.
Robert |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Personally, I think all fouls should be applied from Point Ball Held. If RB gains 9 yards on 1D and then there is a hold flagged, then yes, the PE is the LS. I think PBH is the best because of the simplicity for all to understand:
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Quote:
PBH would be a gyp enforcement spot for most cases of illegal contact against receivers downfield, and it would be dumb in many other cases of contact fouls by the defense during a run, and it would be silly for non-contact and roughness calls of many types not affecting play directly. However, I do wish it were instituted in USAn football for some situations. 3-and-1 (all but one) is a better approximation of justice than PBH would be in some cases of common running play, not all. 3-and-1 has the advantage that the covering official needs to see either the ball (for where it becomes dead) or the foul, but not both simultaneously. Robert |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Enforcement Spot | nelson_28602 | Football | 5 | Fri Sep 30, 2005 11:58pm |
Enforcement Spot | Florida Rookie | Football | 4 | Mon Nov 22, 2004 09:03am |
PSK Spot of enforcement? | BoBo | Football | 4 | Mon Sep 15, 2003 01:46pm |
Spot of enforcement | hllanc | Football | 5 | Sun Oct 20, 2002 03:39pm |
spot of enforcement | joec | Football | 1 | Thu Jan 11, 2001 01:40pm |