The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 10, 2007, 09:59pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn
Not True in Ohio, we have been told that once you accept a penalty on the TD that is the one enforced on the KO. If there is another LB foul on the try it is disregarded! This comes directly from OHSAA!
We had a long discussion about this Friday. I know what most states want in this situation, but do you think anyone has really explained the ramifications?

OK, we have a 15-yard face mask against B on a TD scoring play. A is going to kick for the try, enforcing the 15 yard face mask on the kickoff.

What's to stop B from taking a free shot at the center, kicker, or holder or committing any other live ball penalty?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 10, 2007, 10:45pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN
We had a long discussion about this Friday. I know what most states want in this situation, but do you think anyone has really explained the ramifications?

OK, we have a 15-yard face mask against B on a TD scoring play. A is going to kick for the try, enforcing the 15 yard face mask on the kickoff.

What's to stop B from taking a free shot at the center, kicker, or holder or committing any other live ball penalty?
Actually this is not what the NF has put out so far. Now your state might take a different stance or interpretation but they do not get to carry over several fouls to a kickoff. The rule might change next year, but once there is the scoring team accepts an option, they cannot take two options to the kick off. So what BJ says applies across the board and in the rulebook at this point.

So B gets a free shot. Not sure I like that, but that is the way it is right now.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 11, 2007, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Actually this is not what the NF has put out so far. Now your state might take a different stance or interpretation but they do not get to carry over several fouls to a kickoff. The rule might change next year, but once there is the scoring team accepts an option, they cannot take two options to the kick off. So what BJ says applies across the board and in the rulebook at this point.

So B gets a free shot. Not sure I like that, but that is the way it is right now.

Peace
But isn't a "free shot at the holder, etc" a liveball foul penalized as a dead ball foul? Thus allowing you to penalize the first liveball foul normally and then tack on the dead ball foul.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 11, 2007, 03:48pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
But isn't a "free shot at the holder, etc" a liveball foul penalized as a dead ball foul? Thus allowing you to penalize the first liveball foul normally and then tack on the dead ball foul.
No. Roughing the kicker is not a dead ball foul, so why is roughing the holder?

And dead ball fouls are enforced just like any other dead ball penalty. You do not get an option; you apply only to the succeeding spot.

I fully feel they will change this rule next year because of this obvious hole in the rule.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 11, 2007, 04:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Although I would be VERY careful about applying it, one could use the flagrant foul rule on an obvious "free" try penalty like being discussed here. Yep, the offended won't get any additional yardage out of it, but the offender would be done for the night and around here that would also mean he's done for at least the following week as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 11, 2007, 04:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L
Although I would be VERY careful about applying it, one could use the flagrant foul rule on an obvious "free" try penalty like being discussed here. Yep, the offended won't get any additional yardage out of it, but the offender would be done for the night and around here that would also mean he's done for at least the following week as well.
Another possibility is the kick is missed or blocked thus giving K another shot at the try. Still not fair though if the kick is good.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 10, 2007, 11:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN
We had a long discussion about this Friday. I know what most states want in this situation, but do you think anyone has really explained the ramifications?

OK, we have a 15-yard face mask against B on a TD scoring play. A is going to kick for the try, enforcing the 15 yard face mask on the kickoff.

What's to stop B from taking a free shot at the center, kicker, or holder or committing any other live ball penalty?
Exactly. I expect the case play to be changed next year.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't understand this rule....please help PJUMP Baseball 18 Fri Mar 17, 2006 06:28pm
Help me understand. . . . ChuckElias Basketball 23 Tue Oct 25, 2005 01:43pm
Don't Understand !! APHP Basketball 32 Thu Feb 06, 2003 12:04pm
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) KWH Football 27 Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am
Why do they just not understand? JugglingReferee Basketball 3 Sun Jul 15, 2001 02:12pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1