|
|||
Certainly. If the contact is on the potential receiver, you'd probably call DPI. However, a take down on the other side of the field would be a hold as well as a hold on the line of the scrimmage (defensive lineman pulling a blocker aside so a line backer can blitz).
|
|
|||
Quote:
you answered certainly then you go on to say it is a penalty. which one is it. i believe the answer to the original question should be no, the defense can't hold. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
To help clarify. On a pass behind the line of scrimmage, there is no pass interferance. However, if the Defense holds or tackles the receiver then you do have Defensive Holding. The Defense can hit the receiver with no penalty, but they can not restrain them or tackle them without the ball.
|
|
|||
it can occur anywhere
Where the pass is relative to the line of scrimmage has absolutley no bearing on defensive holding. If it warrants a flag and meets all the philosophical criteria that are followed in your area, you have holding. The only call that the location of the pass relative the LOS will affect is DPI. DPI is only possible on a pass that crosses the LOS. If a back goes out in the flat behind the LOS and is thrown a pass and the defensive back comes up and tackles him before the pass arrives, you would have holding, but not DPI. If the same play occurs beyond the LOS you would have DPI not holding.
__________________
The officials lament, or the coaches excuses as it were: "I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you" |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
defensive holding | Biscuit | Football | 4 | Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:58am |
Defensive Holding | foolhearted | Football | 3 | Mon Oct 24, 2005 09:41am |
Defensive Holding Question | Zebra29 | Football | 14 | Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:41am |
Defensive Holding or Not? | mikesears | Football | 10 | Thu Sep 15, 2005 04:41pm |
defensive holding | joeg | Football | 5 | Fri Dec 05, 2003 05:12pm |