The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 23, 2006, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fayette Missouri
Posts: 100
Illegal Participation

Havent had this come up or anything, just was thinking about it.

Has anyone ever thought about the way to enforce illegal participation...when say there are 12 Team B members on a play (yeah, I know we nail them with Illegal Sub. before the snap, but nevertheless...) and Team A gains 16 or more yards on the play.

For enforcement we say... accept and we give them 15 from the previous spot, or decline and take the ball where you were tackled. In this case (more than what the penalty is giving them)

What is to say that it's the 12th man that made the tackle, and that A would have had more yards on the play, had the defense only been playing with 11.

Seems like a special enforcement simliar to Roughing the passer would be appropriate for a situation like that.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 23, 2006, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
This is just like any play where A outgains the penalty enforcement. IP is "worth" 15 yards. If A gained more than what the penalty is worth, then A's choosing to decline makes total sense to me, just like a play where the defense interferes, knocking the receiver off stride, but the receiver makes the catch anyway, falling down immediately. Perhaps with out the interference, he keeps his feet and score, but we cannot assume that. The way the current rule is written totally makes sense to me.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 23, 2006, 01:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by cougar729
Havent had this come up or anything, just was thinking about it.

Has anyone ever thought about the way to enforce illegal participation...when say there are 12 Team B members on a play (yeah, I know we nail them with Illegal Sub. before the snap, but nevertheless...) and Team A gains 16 or more yards on the play.

For enforcement we say... accept and we give them 15 from the previous spot, or decline and take the ball where you were tackled. In this case (more than what the penalty is giving them)

What is to say that it's the 12th man that made the tackle, and that A would have had more yards on the play, had the defense only been playing with 11.

Seems like a special enforcement simliar to Roughing the passer would be appropriate for a situation like that.
I think that you have a good point here, maybe the runner would have scored a TD if they would have only had 11 players. Maybe it should be taked on the the end of the play.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 23, 2006, 02:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mid michigan
Posts: 12
in our games this year we have had this called 3 different ways.

first was a 10 yd penalty and replay the down

second was a 5 yd penalty (dont think the ref knew what he was doing, he made alot of other calls like this) and replay the down

third was this weekend and it was a 15 yd penalty at the end of the run.

so if i am reading what you all have put down here, it should be a 15 yd penalty enforced from the original LOS, unless the team declines, in which case it would be the result of the play?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 23, 2006, 03:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIcoach
in our games this year we have had this called 3 different ways.

first was a 10 yd penalty and replay the down

second was a 5 yd penalty (dont think the ref knew what he was doing, he made alot of other calls like this) and replay the down

third was this weekend and it was a 15 yd penalty at the end of the run.

so if i am reading what you all have put down here, it should be a 15 yd penalty enforced from the original LOS, unless the team declines, in which case it would be the result of the play?
If they kill the play just before the snap(sometimes sounds like AT the snap), it would be 5 and replay. if the play continues, it's 15 from the original LOS (or decline).

Someone did mention here a few weeks back that IP in their area was 10 yards, but I don't remember if that was HS, LL, Canadian, or something else.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 23, 2006, 05:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
Can someone explain to me the difference between illegal substitution and illegal participation?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 23, 2006, 07:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72
Can someone explain to me the difference between illegal substitution and illegal participation?
10 yards.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 24, 2006, 06:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ten Mile, Tn
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72
Can someone explain to me the difference between illegal substitution and illegal participation?
Illegal substitution can be a live ball or a dead ball foul, but does not involve particpation. Illegal participation always involves participation and is always a live ball foul. The prime example is 12 players on the field. If the play is killed before the snap, it is illegal substitution. If the snap takes place and all 12 players participate, it is illegal participation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
illegal Substitution or illegal Participation verticalStripes Football 11 Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:57am
Illegal Participation Simbio Football 3 Tue Aug 15, 2006 03:47pm
Illegal Formation or Illegal participation? wgw Football 9 Mon Aug 29, 2005 09:31am
Illegal participation, ... or not? kentref Football 23 Sun Jun 05, 2005 03:23am
illegal participation? gtwbam Football 6 Fri Oct 01, 2004 10:50am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1