![]() |
|
|
|||
Think of it this way. As long at the receiver touches the pylon while he is airborn it's like he hasn't touched it at all simply because he is in the air. What if the pylon was not there and he jumps up, catches the ball and lands inbounds. TD.
If he hits the pylon going up or coming down, he still has to get both feet inbounds. It makes sense to me. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
End Zone Pylon Question | richredskin | Football | 7 | Tue Feb 07, 2006 08:33pm |
IP and the Pylon | ljudge | Football | 10 | Wed Aug 04, 2004 03:26pm |
There are no rules and those are the rules. NCAA | JeffTheRef | Basketball | 6 | Sat Feb 07, 2004 11:01pm |
Goal Line Pylon | jrfath | Football | 27 | Thu Oct 16, 2003 02:37pm |
Runner diving for the pylon. | Mike Simonds | Football | 8 | Tue Aug 06, 2002 03:55pm |