|
|
|
Fri Sep 29, 2006, 08:56am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I believe that when the two sources are in conflict, it's best to look at the rulebook. In this case, the rulebook has definitions for "player" and "substitute" which seem to me to indicate that the Redding interp is correct. Assuming no attempt to deceive, this player was never substituted for, and thus never lost his status as a player (despite the CB play).
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson 
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| illegal Substitution or illegal Participation | verticalStripes | Football | 11 | Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:57am |
| Illegal hit or not? | zanzibar | Volleyball | 2 | Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:36am |
| Illegal Formation or Illegal participation? | wgw | Football | 9 | Mon Aug 29, 2005 09:31am |
| Illegal Motion or Illegal Shift | Simbio | Football | 11 | Fri Oct 31, 2003 08:50pm |
| illegal ball... illegal pitch? | [email protected] | Baseball | 5 | Thu Apr 17, 2003 06:57pm |
Hybrid Mode
