The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 15, 2006, 11:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Back or Not?

Open Book Test Question - How would you answer this?

A Team A player is a back if the player's head or foot does not break the plane of an imaginary line drawn parallel to the line of scrimmage through the waistline of the nearest teammate who is on the line.

The rule refers to any part of his body, not just his head or foot. I answered the question false for that reason, and have not yet received the results. Did I read too much into it?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 15, 2006, 11:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Streamwood, Illinois
Posts: 38
the answer to this question would be True.

Just take the question as it is.

If the head or foot does not break the plane.... he is a back.

Rule refereces are 7-2-3 and 2-32-3

the rule does say any part of the body, but in this question they are only concerned with the head or foot.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 15, 2006, 11:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: The Fed answer key says this is "true." With the Fed, it's always a crap shoot when their T-F question doesn't precisely match a rule book statement.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 15, 2006, 11:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob M.
REPLY: The Fed answer key says this is "true." With the Fed, it's always a crap shoot when their T-F question doesn't precisely match a rule book statement.
Interesting! This is supposedly a local test, and has nothing on it identifying it as a Fed test. I wonder if they just copied the test and removed the Fed logo?

Thanks for the replies. I guess I will have to settle for missing one.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 15, 2006, 12:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue37
Interesting! This is supposedly a local test, and has nothing on it identifying it as a Fed test. I wonder if they just copied the test and removed the Fed logo?

Thanks for the replies. I guess I will have to settle for missing one.
REPLY: It was question #65 on the 2006 Federation Part 1 exam.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 15, 2006, 02:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob M.
REPLY: It was question #65 on the 2006 Federation Part 1 exam.
It was #37 on my test, so, if they copied it, at least they renumbered.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 15, 2006, 02:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 379
Or maybe they used an older test as the fed likes to recycle most of their questions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Over and back force39 Basketball 2 Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:08pm
over and back? ohref Basketball 7 Sun Feb 16, 2003 05:44pm
Over and back Dubby Basketball 11 Wed Feb 05, 2003 07:45pm
over-n-back kld9 Basketball 2 Fri Jan 24, 2003 03:00pm
Over The Back JWalker Basketball 38 Tue Apr 30, 2002 10:02pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1