The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 23, 2006, 09:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Regardless of how many games played under their rules, the NCAA's interest in non-NCAA games is and probably should be minimal. I agree they should pay some attention to weird things that happen at lower levels, and be willing to listen to suggestions, but their interest is college football. If Texas and Mass schools want to go along for the ride, fine. But what UIL and the Mass. state association can do if they want a change is simple: adopt an exception. Last year, Texas had 33 exceptions covering everything from tee usage on place kicks and goal post size to timing and fighting regulations. It isn't that difficult for Texas to say goalposts will be 23+ feet instead of 18+. Its even less difficult to say quarter times are 12 instead of 15.

I know basketball coaches all over Texas that hate the basketball free throw lane restriction rule (can't move before ball hits rim), but they play by it (or are supposed to). There are other examples of states that don't like a mandated Fed rule. To me, Texas shouldn't complain in the least since if they used Fed, they'd have a much more limited autonomy to adjust the rules or risk not having any say in that. This way the NCAA doesn't care in the least what Texas does to their rules.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've heard, the majority of complaints on the new timing rules, as far as the coaches are concerned, deal with starting the clock on the RFP after a punt, for example. How hard can it be for Texas to put in a rule exception for that? In sub-varsity, especially below JV, we are very unregimented about timing, especially on starting the clock on RFP when we should start it on the snap. Nobody knows the difference and the games get over in a reasonable time.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 24, 2006, 05:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
Chances are that even if the NCAA gets the train back on the tracks such that next year's process is more efficient than this year's (and whether or not UIL is in the room next year), there will be UIL exceptions on the timing rules. There will be a good body of evidence gathered this year which can accurately forecast the number of plays and how long the games will last were UIL to adopt all the timing changes. Once UIL and THSCA see that, I have no doubt they will go along with an exception to the timing changes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2006 ASA Slowpitch Rule Book NASTY Softball 2 Mon May 08, 2006 10:52am
2006 NCAA Rule Changes and Editorial Changes gscsj Football 1 Mon Mar 27, 2006 03:25pm
2006 NCAA Rules Changes BigUmp56 Baseball 2 Thu Jan 26, 2006 12:57pm
2006 Rule Changes Posted SRW Softball 1 Mon Nov 28, 2005 09:09pm
NCAA rules questions - Wrong # in book pizanno Basketball 5 Wed Feb 23, 2005 01:35pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1