|
Sun Jan 04, 2004, 06:20pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why is intentional grounding not called when the "tuck rule" is called? For instance in today's GB win over Seattle in the playoffs Hasselback's pass was ruled incomplete because of the tuck, but he was still in the pocket, the ball did not pass the line of scrimmage nor was there and eligible reciever nearby. Sounds like grounding to me.
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
