The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 31, 2018, 12:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,174
NFL Touchdown Logic

Giants/Dallas

Anyone know why do you have to have two feet in bounds on TD pass catch but only one knee?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 31, 2018, 09:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 17,032
Are you looking for something more than "it's the rule?" This is from an old column by Jerry Markbreit (sp?):

Say a receiver makes a leaping catch along the sidelines, lands with one foot inbounds, hops on that foot, remaining inbounds, then brings the second down out of bounds. Is this a catch? Is one foot in bounds twice the equivalent of two feet in? --Bryan Schwerer, Cary, N.C.

There is an old saying coined by John Madden: "One knee equals two feet." This is true; however, both feet must land inbounds in order to have a successful catch. If the receiver lands on one foot and hops on the same foot so that the foot touches inbounds twice, it is an incomplete forward pass. If the receiver touches inbounds with ANY part of his body other than hands or feet, he has completed the requirement for a successful reception.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 31, 2018, 12:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
Giants/Dallas

Anyone know why do you have to have two feet in bounds on TD pass catch but only one knee?
Higher (paid) talent requires higher skill, as decided by the people paying for the talent.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 31, 2018, 12:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Are you looking for something more than "it's the rule?" .

There is an old saying coined by John Madden: "One knee equals two feet." This is true; .
Yes - wondering why?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 31, 2018, 03:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
Yes - wondering why?
This is one of those things the NFL inherited from the old Football Rules Committee.

Originally the rules were not specific regarding a player's gaining possession of the ball while not touching the ground. There was no special coverage of such situations, which came up so rarely as to hardly affect the game. It was first addressed some time after the forward pass was legalized, originally saying just that the "player" had to touch down in bounds, no body parts specified. Later it was decided it would be easier to see if both feet in bounds were required. If a player landed straddling a boundary, this obviated the need to tell which foot came down first. When the rule was made making the ball dead if a player possessing it touched the ground w some part of the body other than hands or feet, the Football Rules Committee -- unlike the NFL of recent years -- thought it consistent to also rule possession of the ball at that tiime.

After the NFL started making its own rules, they went back to the old rule on a tackle, so that a player on the ground w the ball in his possession was not down unless "so held" by an opponent (altered again later). But they kept the case of possession for a player who caught the ball in the air and then came down w some body part other than hands or feet on the ground. (You probably know about the recent tinkering back & forth on that point by NFL that for a while kept possession in abeyance while action continued out of bounds or with a ball that would be ruled retroactively dead.)

Meanwhile NCAA & Fed revised their rules to make it any body part in bounds -- usually stated as 1 foot, because that's the most common case. So it's back to the original wording of simply contacting the ground, but with an understanding that wasn't necessarily there originally that it really doesn't matter how much or what key parts of the body touch, and trusting a covering official to have quick eyes when body parts touch bang-bang.

Last edited by Robert Goodman; Mon Dec 31, 2018 at 03:44pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the NFL ever going to use logic with its replay rules? hbk314 Football 73 Wed Dec 25, 2013 01:53am
Rule Logic? tcannizzo Softball 14 Fri Aug 26, 2011 07:37am
Logic of division line throw in after technical Rooster Basketball 7 Tue Feb 23, 2010 03:29pm
Signal Logic Ref Daddy Basketball 6 Thu Feb 02, 2006 05:01pm
Logic behind "no dunking in warmups" KingTripleJump Basketball 36 Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:37am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1