The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 13, 2018, 11:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 537
Further details on the mechanics of how this will go down...

Sorry, CT1, no replay official outside of state championship games! R and a non-involved official will go watch an iPad on the sideline. This should go well...

How will instant replay work in Alabama HS football? Answering 20 questions | AL.com
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 14, 2018, 08:02am
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
The worst thing about this is having to "officiate to replay" in some games, but using our normal "When In Doubt" philosophies in others.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:32pm
Chain of Fools
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
The NF has spent the last few months telling any media outlet that will listen how the shortage of officials is reaching crisis levels. Multiple newspapers in multiple states have printed the story. But now we have Alabama basically saying "Hold muh beer".

This is about as tone deaf as it gets.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 14, 2018, 07:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Rockville,MD
Posts: 1,165
Maybe Alabama has a surplus of football officials, instead of a deficit, and will be promoting subvarsity officials to varsity games, especially with instant replay coming in :P. Maybe those games with replay will also be 7-man games .
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 19, 2018, 01:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 177
Who is the winner in this? The kids... Nope, The officials.... Nope, or DVSports (Ding Ding Ding)????
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2018, 06:17am
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by john5396 View Post
Who is the winner in this? The kids... Nope, The officials.... Nope, or DVSports (Ding Ding Ding)????
I'd say so. DVSports' price is $3500 for the first year's lease, $1500 for each year thereafter, and that's for only two cameras. Additional cameras are $500/year each. In addition, each camera will require a trained operator to get the best look. Very few schools will be willing to make that kind of commitment.

It's my opinion that the Executive Director and Director of Officials are tired of taking so many late Friday / early Saturday phone calls from coaches complaining that they got jobbed. Now, if the school wasn't using replay, they have an easy out.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 19, 2018, 01:04pm
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Thumbs up I agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by john5396 View Post
Who is the winner in this? The kids... Nope, The officials.... Nope, or DVSports (Ding Ding Ding)????
Exactly!!
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 19, 2018, 10:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 View Post
The worst thing about this is having to "officiate to replay" in some games, but using our normal "When In Doubt" philosophies in others.
Based on conversations I've had with D1 and NFL officials that is not necessarily true. They are instructed to officiate as they see it using "When in doubt" when necessary, because you never know when replay will malfunction. There may be some of this, but those situations would be rare and not difficult for a newer official to replay to handle.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 09, 2018, 02:40pm
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Good Luck with your experiment Alabama, but unfortunatly...

...the odds of taking a 30.06 outside, firing at the Moon and actually hitting the Apollo 11 landing site are much better then "Replay" having any chance of ever being added to the NFHS Football Rules Book!
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 10, 2018, 07:18am
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWH View Post
...the odds of taking a 30.06 outside, firing at the Moon and actually hitting the Apollo 11 landing site are much better then "Replay" having any chance of ever being added to the NFHS Football Rules Book!
That may be true right now, but I suspect it will eventually be a "by state adoption" addition. NFHS's "customers" (i.e., coaches and supporters) will demand it.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 10, 2018, 07:42am
Chain of Fools
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
My alma mater is struggling to get funds to buy additional helmets and new uniforms. This will devolve into a haves and have nots situation. It all sounds good when DVS or whoever breezes in to your governing body's board/committee meeting and puts on the dog and pony show.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 11, 2018, 06:34am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 View Post
That may be true right now, but I suspect it will eventually be a "by state adoption" addition. NFHS's "customers" (i.e., coaches and supporters) will demand it.
This sounds like the shot clock argument in basketball. Yes people say they want it, but do not have the money to make it happen.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
The questions/answers on the referenced article provides an excellent summary of some of the major concerns, and plans, for this proposal.

Not surprisingly, in view of all the recent concerns about "the growing length of Interscholastic Football games duration", the article suggests this proposal (Replay Review) anticipates adding 20-30 minutes to actual game time (which will be verified during the test period).

Considering the limited general benefit, that has actually accrued to games played at higher levels (unique to their individual environments), the size, scope and anticipated expense of expanding this additional across the HS level Football spectrum, it raises reasonable questions of "risk/effort vs reward/need".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1