![]() |
|
|||
If they're trying to determine what the result of the play is, to determine the "ruling on the field", they have to determine
1) did the receiver carry the ball across the goal line? 1a) if not, did he fumble? 1b) if no fumble, what is the spot? 1c) if fumble, whatare the circumstances of the recovery? Finally, are there any penalties, or anything that wasn't a penalty (yet) because of other action in the play that is reviewable? Even with the WH properly controlling the conversation, this could take a couple minutes to sort out on a broken play. And please, Back Judge if you've got offsetting live ball fouls, tell me up front and we'll just replay the down. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another end zone rationale question | voiceoflg | Football | 3 | Mon Nov 16, 2009 01:17pm |
Kicks into the endzone: rationale | RadioBlue | Football | 16 | Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:45pm |
OBR Balk Rule history/rationale question | Rich Ives | Baseball | 19 | Sun Jul 03, 2005 12:27pm |
Rationale Please | Chuck Lewis | Basketball | 1 | Thu Nov 06, 2003 01:17am |
Rationale Please | Just Curious | Basketball | 10 | Wed Nov 28, 2001 12:47pm |