Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed
Which is the intent of the NFHS/NCAA rule and the way I call it.
|
It is?
Quote:
9.11.1 SITUATION D:
The ball is on the ring of Team A's basket when A1 hits the net.
RULING: Basket interference by A1. No goal. The ball became dead when A1 touched the net as it is part of the basket. (4-6; 6-7-9)
NCAAM A.R. 225/NCAAW A.R. 231:
Before the ball is in flight for a two-point try, A1 is fouled in the act of shooting. A1’s try enters the basket. A2 touches the ring while the ball is in the basket.
RULING: Basket interference on A2. The goal shall be canceled. A1 shall be awarded two free throws because of the foul. (Rule 9-18.3 and 10-1 Penalty d[1])
|
I realize the NCAA case book plays only mention the ring but there aren't any that mention the net. However, since touching the net while the ball is within the basket is also BI under both codes I'll take a leap of faith that the ruling would be the same.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
|
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 09:12am
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
