Where are the NFHS rule changes?

[SC Official]

Am I missing something here? Weren't we all given an interpretation last year that said a ball handler was considered any player, including one in the post? This isn't a new rule, this is just new language being added to the book that is being passed off as a new rule.

[APG]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Am I missing something here? Weren't we all given an interpretation last year that said a ball handler was considered any player, including one in the post? This isn't a new rule, this is just new language being added to the book that is being passed off as a new rule.

There is nothing new from NFHS this year

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Am I missing something here? Weren't we all given an interpretation last year that said a ball handler was considered any player, including one in the post? This isn't a new rule, this is just new language being added to the book that is being passed off as a new rule.

Did you read post #27?

[scrounge]

At least they didn't just do something for the sake of doing something.

Look at the bright side - no 'color of socks' rule at least!

[BryanV21]

Originally Posted by scrounge

At least they didn't just do something for the sake of doing something.

Look at the bright side - no 'color of socks' rule at least!

Don't wake a sleeping giant.

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Am I missing something here? Weren't we all given an interpretation last year that said a ball handler was considered any player, including one in the post? This isn't a new rule, this is just new language being added to the book that is being passed off as a new rule.

The language in the release also doesn't make sense because NF doesn't define "post players" and the "lane area" in the rule book (NCAA defines both).

NF would also be wise to spend a few bucks on a proofreader.