NCAA-Men's Rule Change Proposals

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by AremRed

So NCAA-W is the new WNBA D-League?

Is that a problem???

[JetMetFan]

This is a bit of a danger line (from ncaa.org's release):

The key areas the committee will focus on in the upcoming season are:

Screening, particularly moving screens and requiring that the screener be stationary.

...since screeners aren't currently required to be stationary.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

This is a bit of a danger line (from ncaa.org's release):


...since screeners aren't currently required to be stationary.

I think we know what they're talking about....the screen where the screener leans out or steps out into the path of the defender at the last moment, creating contact that slows the defender down, and it goes uncalled. It happens a lot.

[wheels]

Do you think the Men's should go to 4 qtrs? If so, would like the 5 team fouls and shoot 2 free-throws?

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by wheels

Do you think the Men's should go to 4 qtrs? If so, would like the 5 team fouls and shoot 2 free-throws?

The point at which you go into the bonus is really no connected to the quarters vs. halves issue.

I can see pros and cons with going with separate foul count per quarter. Whatever the case, it should not be tweaked to shoot fewer FTs overall if they want the game to be less physical. If they eliminate the 1+1, that would allow a team a few more fouls give in some cases.

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I think we know that they're talking about....the screen where the screener leans out or steps out into the path of the defender at the last moment, creating contact that slows the defender down, and it goes uncalled. It happens a lot.

I know we think we know but remember the second time NCAAM changed the LGP rule for an airborne shooter and the initial interp was any movement by the defender - including backwards - would result in a blocking foul?

That's why I get concerned sometimes.