![]() |
|
|
|||
Also worth another look is the pass and crash with 4.6 seconds left.
I'd also like to see the change of the call from travel to foul at 1:38 in OT. Last edited by SC Official; Sat Feb 21, 2015 at 10:20pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
#1. Should have been a foul. Getting hit in the face like that should be called.
#2. Good call. #3. Another good call.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
If it were on the arm, I'd agree. I consider getting hit in the face a little different.....a protecting the shooter kind of situation.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
1. He blocks the ball, but the follow through to the face is not allowed and is not incidental.
2. The secondary defender definitely arrived in time, but it seems that most of the contact comes from his teammate who was the primary defender. I don't believe that the offensive player crashed the defender. Strange looking play. 3. Sadly, this was not a double whistle. This was Jamie Luckie deciding to call a foul AFTER his partner had whistled AND signaled a travel. There are plenty of bodies in the way, but from my review of the video it does not appear that the Georgia player rolled up on the rear foot of the player with the ball. He probably did make some contact with it. It seems that he was already off balance and falling before any contact with that rear foot. I prefer the travel call by the primary official. I also can't defend Luckie making a call well after his partner and then running in and taking it. To me that's not helping a partner that's overriding his decision. I also don't believe that he has a clear look from 40 feet away through three other players. |
|
|||
After a 2nd look. I agree.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
#2 is a very odd play indeed. From lead, it looks like an easy offensive foul call. From the other angles though, not really sure who caused that collision. Contact with the player taking the charge came from a teammate, but I can't tell how much contact there was between the offensive player and said teammate.
|
|
|||
1) I'm not penalizing this great play. He may have gotten him in the head, but that contact was incidental to the blocked shot.
2) The lead is straightlined on this play and not in position to see who initiated the contacr. That looks like a no-call. 3) What is Jamie Luckie doing on this play other than holding up his fist AFTER the travel call, storming in to take the call WITHOUT any concern for his partner, and then pointing at a million different bodies? I'm not convinced a foul was the correct call there, either. I'm also not happy if I'm the lead in that situation, although I realize who I'm working with. Last edited by SC Official; Sun Feb 22, 2015 at 10:08am. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Foul or incidental contact? | Coach Bill | Basketball | 55 | Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:27am |
Bama/LSU technical foul rescinded | OnePutt | Basketball | 4 | Sun Jan 30, 2011 06:36pm |
Foul or incidental contact? | rfp | Basketball | 19 | Fri Sep 25, 2009 02:13pm |
foul or incidental contact | CecilOne | Soccer | 6 | Tue Aug 05, 2003 01:45pm |
Foul or incidental contact? | Buckley11 | Basketball | 1 | Sat Mar 01, 2003 06:39pm |