![]() |
|
|||
experienced partner
I have 15 years experience, I worked a game today where I was the junior partner. Both partners had over 20 years.
Great game, tied at the half and no team had more than a 3 point lead. With under a minute to go in a 1 point game, senior partner comes running from BC as trail, yelling ROTATE, ROTATE. I was lead, 6 players on my side, 4 on the other, ball near the foul line, C has the match up. The ball has moved all day, rearly settled. I rotate, ball fumbled and A falls on top of it, no call. She passes it out and B1 & A2 battle over the ball. I have nothing and C charges over calling a foul on B1. He is about 45 feet fr the action. I feel like the pressure got to him and he had to take over. Anyway, BW shoots 1 plus and misses. A1 Rebounds with a 1 point lead. 12 seconds left. TO, foul, foul, foul, horn game over...the foul count was 8-4. You can learn a lot about your partner in a tight game. |
|
|||
If C needed help, and he didn't, he would have rotated out to trail. I would have come across. Jmo, it wasn't needed yet with the ball movement. My main point was partner's last 2 actions.
I don't feel a need to take charge of the game. He took over. We had 2 officials on ball side. He comes from 45 feet to make a call that wasn't there. |
|
||||
Quote:
Matter of fact, the L could rotate over and the C may just stay the C for a while if that's the best spot to officiate the ball. Our crew doesn't leave the C on the ball. If C is counting closely guarded, that means the L should be rotating and making the C the new trail. |
|
|||
Quote:
She did not have control of the ball when she fell. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Not This:
Quote:
Quote:
The more I study video (of myself and others) "This" seems to be preferred as a C mechanic rather than "Not This". True or False: C can often get a much better look by stepping down when the on-ball matchup is right in front of him. L comes across...so what? L isn't going to be looking at C's matchup anyway; he's looking at the competitive matchup(s) C can't observe because of the overload on C's side. When C's matchup evaporates, then he can move up to T. The point I'm testing is this: we get ourselves into a less advantageous position when we, as C, "loop up" to T too quickly. Responses and reactions to that suggestion welcome. C -- Loop Up or Step Down?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call Last edited by Freddy; Tue Feb 17, 2015 at 09:47am. |
|
||||
Furthermore, if the C is on-ball here and there's pressure, the chances that something happens on *that* side of the court get much higher.
It's OK to rotate and then rotate back if needed. My experience is that many HS officials do not rotate enough. Go to an NBA, NCAAW, or even NCAAM game and see when those people rotate -- a lot more than most HS officials do. |
|
|||
Quote:
So....nothing wrong with two C's for a while. Stay and officiate what's right in front of you. If you need a step to get an angle, open low rather than high if possible. And for pete's sake stop worrying about getting beat in transition; it's gonna happen sometimes, but there are ways to overcome this. If the offense completely resets and the ball comes back to the top of the perimeter, now would be the time to loop up and start over. If you don't believe me, ask Donnie Vaden. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experienced but unambitious... | utahkarakita | Basketball | 10 | Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:36pm |
Experienced Backjudges? | movingthechains | Football | 33 | Mon Oct 05, 2009 01:03pm |
What is an experienced ref? | tomegun | Basketball | 45 | Tue Jul 05, 2005 08:10pm |
For the experienced officials... | ref18 | Basketball | 6 | Sun Feb 13, 2005 09:40pm |
Yet another question for the less experienced | cmathews | Football | 9 | Thu Sep 23, 2004 06:43am |