![]() |
|
|
|||
As I understand it, there are basically 4 possibilities if you have a blarge. Get together with partners and figure out which applies.
1) Ball had not been released yet by A1 when fouls occurred --> Report both fouls. No basket scored. Ball to A as A had team control at the POI. 2) Ball had been released on shot by A1 and shot is good --> Score basket, report both fouls. Award Ball to B who may run the end line. 3) Ball had been released on shot by A1 and shot is not good --> Report both fouls. Award Ball based on possession arrow at the spot nearest the foul. 4) Ball had been released on a pass to teammate when the fouls occurred --> Report both fouls. Ball to A as A maintained team control on a pass. |
|
|||
Quote:
It is not necessary to report both fouls. You can confer and go with one call. Check with your assignor and see how it is to be handled where you work.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
I don't understand the problem with picking one of the fouls and going with it.
Sure, one of the coaches is going to be upset, but does that matter? Are we to make changes to calls based on coaches being upset with it? If so, then we're going to be changing quite a bit. And it seems to me that only one of the calls is correct. It can't be a charge and a block. I mean, both can happen, but not at the same time. So why would an assignor take issue with getting together, and figuring out which one to go with? And going with the primary officials call seems like the best course of action. |
|
|||
Quote:
"Ruling a double foul on a block/charge would not be the thing to do." Theresia D. Wynns Editor NFHS Publications
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Did you ever ask her what the casebook play was supposed to mean?
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
No, he never did directly ask when the case play should apply.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
She said if neither official will give up his call, then report both fouls. The case play tells us what to do then, but as I read it, that's all it tells us. Apparently her view is the same, along with my current association rules interpreter, and the state supervisor of officials.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Because every one of my supervisors expects us to go with a blarge.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Not according to the Case Book. Two signals=double foul.
|
|
|||
Depends on how you interpret the case. Show me the part where it mentions signals at all. And then show the part that requires both fouls be reported, no matter what happened.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
||||
Quote:
Everyone who matters at the national level, and every state level but one, interprets the case play in the only way that makes sense. "Call" = "signal"
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Actually, it now says "rules" rather than "calls."
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Almost blarge | zm1283 | Basketball | 49 | Thu Jan 10, 2013 05:50pm |
Another Blarge | Scrapper1 | Basketball | 46 | Tue Mar 08, 2011 07:08am |
uh oh....BLARGE!!!! | vbzebra | Basketball | 43 | Tue Jan 18, 2011 09:58am |
Blarge | All_Heart | Basketball | 14 | Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:39pm |
Another Blarge | Snake~eyes | Basketball | 6 | Fri Jan 13, 2006 03:16pm |