Virginia-UNC

[letemplay]

Pretty sure Coach K thought a foul should go against UNC

[so cal lurker]

These plays show a glitch in the "get it right" sense of review -- where the review can only review one thing (last touch) and not another (foul), the review can make things worse. (I recall watching this in an NBA game -- replay showed both a clear foul and a last touch by the victim of the foul -- so the OOB call was reversed to the benefit of the player who committed the foul, as the OOB and not the foul was reviewable [at least at that time].)

[bob jenkins]

Is this review mandatory in NCAAM? It's optional / voluntary in NCAAW.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

11-2-2

e. Violations.
In the last two minutes of the second period and overtime(s), to determine
the following:
1. Whether a shot clock violation occurred.

2. Which team caused the ball to go out of bounds when there is a deflection involving two or more players.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Is this review mandatory in NCAAM? It's optional / voluntary in NCAAW.

Here is the full text as applicable to OOB calls.

Rule 11 Section 2. Instant Replay—Voluntary Use (Except Where Noted)

e. Violations.
In the last two minutes of the second period and overtime(s), to determine
the following:
1. Whether a shot clock violation occurred.
2. Which team caused the ball to go out of bounds when there is a deflection
involving two or more players.

[Adam]

So I wonder, if the coach tried to force the review at this point, if the officials could have simply said, "Coach, we're ready to call a foul on your guy if we have to: your call."

Originally Posted by Adam

So I wonder, if the coach tried to force the review at this point, if the officials could have simply said, "Coach, we're ready to call a foul on your guy if we have to: your call."

Can they do that?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Adam

So I wonder, if the coach tried to force the review at this point, if the officials could have simply said, "Coach, we're ready to call a foul on your guy if we have to: your call."

Originally Posted by AremRed

Can they do that?

No...but they may have told Roy W. that the ball only went off one player's hand, so by rule it is not reviewable. Now what hand that was is another story, and affected by the possibility that a foul maybe should have been called.

[dahoopref]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Can they do that?

This actually happened to me in a game as the U2 of the crew. The veteran of the crew was the Trail and had a better relationship with the coach. The R came in and said to the coach, "My partner is asking if "we" have anything different. If we have to go to the monitor, I will huddle with the crew before we go to the table and explain we had a foul before the out of bounds."

Yes, it is best to change the call on the spot but sometimes crews do get together when the clock is stopped to see who has the best look and adjudicate it properly.

The coach understood and didn't say anything after that.