|
|||
Correct Application
In our game last night one referee called a reaching foul on my player at mid-court which resulted in our 6th team foul. Before the opposing team
could inbound the ball at mid-court after the common foul, same referee called a technical foul on me. The opposing team was awarded 2 shots for the technical. I assumed the opposing team would then take the ball out on the sideline. However, and I'm guessing since I wasn't allowed to stand up and question, the referee in question then awarded a one and one to the opposing team's player who was fouled at mid-court. After she shot the one and one, the opposing team was awarded possession on the sideline. My question is how do you go back and penalize the 6th team foul with a one and one? The technical was a subsequent foul that had nothing to do with the common 6th foul. The opposing team was awarded 4 free throws and possession of the ball at a critical juncture of a close game. |
|
||||
Quote:
I haven't called a "reaching" foul in more than 10 years.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
It's a correctable error. You are allowed to stand to try to prevent / rectify that (you're supposed to ask the scorer to signal the referee and tehn have the discussion).
|
|
|||
His point was that there is no such thing as a "reaching foul." A player who reaches in may be guilty of a foul for making contact with the opponent, but the reach itself is not a foul. If you had referees who were actually calling "reaching" a foul when they reported to the scorers table, you had official with littleor no training. If so, it is not surprising that they would botch the enforcement here.
Last edited by so cal lurker; Thu Jan 15, 2015 at 12:56pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
I actually had, very recently, in a varsity game, a partner who told players to "quit reaching"... and he's definitely not 'untrained'. What age/level was this game? |
|
|||
This is the most important take away from this thread.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
If you hadn't had said your player was called for a "reaching" foul, I'd have more confidence in your judgment.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
so team A has 5 fouls, A1 fouls for the 6th foul and after a Tech is called. Team A should be shooting the T, not the bonus.
Same as above but let's say somehow there was a simultaneous foul and Tech on team A. Shoot the bonus here? |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Application of the lookback rule | BratzCoach | Softball | 29 | Mon Jul 18, 2011 03:34pm |
application of ASA 10.3.C (detailed play) | okla21fan | Softball | 28 | Fri May 20, 2011 11:25pm |
Proper application of OBS? | U of M Sam | Softball | 1 | Sun Jul 10, 2005 12:03pm |
Application of 9.01(c) | akalsey | Baseball | 20 | Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:49pm |