Throw-in Pt. 2

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by BigCat

case book 9.2.2 c

9.2.2 SITUATION C: A1 scores a basket. After the ball goes through the net, B1
grabs it and makes a move toward the end line as though preparing to make a
throw-in. However, B1 never legally steps out of bounds, both feet remain
inbounds. B1 immediately passes the ball up the court to a fast-breaking teammate,
who scores a basket. RULING: Cancel Team B's goal, throw-in violation on
B1. The ball was at B1's disposal after the made basket to make a throw-in. B1
must be out of bounds to make a legal throw-in. (7-4-3; 7-5-7)

[DrPete]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

....... However, B1 never legally steps out of bounds, both feet remain inbounds......

Would it make any difference if one foot was out of bounds but the other foot still in bounds (and touching the floor)? Seems like that would be a violation as well. Just wondering why they worded the case book play they way they did, instead of simply saying that the thrower was not completely out of bounds.

[SNIPERBBB]

Originally Posted by DrPete

Would it make any difference if one foot was out of bounds but the other foot still in bounds (and touching the floor)? Seems like that would be a violation as well. Just wondering why they worded the case book play they way they did, instead of simply saying that the thrower was not completely out of bounds.

Doesnt change what the violation is.

[so cal lurker]

Originally Posted by DrPete

Would it make any difference if one foot was out of bounds but the other foot still in bounds (and touching the floor)? Seems like that would be a violation as well. Just wondering why they worded the case book play they way they did, instead of simply saying that the thrower was not completely out of bounds.

Beause if he was partially out of bounds folks would wonder what would happen if he hadn't gone out at all . . . partially out is the more obvious violation . . .