Basket Interference with unintended advantage.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by justacoach

Wasn't there a weird sitch in an NCAAM game a few years back game with unintended consequences, like a TF?

Goal tending on a free throw is a technical foul. Basket Interference is not.

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by Adam

Goal tending on a free throw is a technical foul. Basket Interference is not.

I'd likely go with the T, anyway. NFHS 10-3-6 says unsporting acts are "not limited to" the list of items, which includes goaltending a free throw. I'd submit that would include BI, as well. If nothing else, it's certainly an unsporting act, given the reason.

[Raymond]

what if the free throw shooter jumps in the air and commits a flagrant foul before the basket interference.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

what if the free throw shooter jumps in the air and commits a flagrant foul before the basket interference.

Not fair... I was eating when I read this.

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

what if the free throw shooter jumps in the air and commits a flagrant foul before the basket interference.

I'd retire on the spot.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by bainsey

I'd likely go with the T, anyway. NFHS 10-3-6 says unsporting acts are "not limited to" the list of items, which includes goaltending a free throw. I'd submit that would include BI, as well. If nothing else, it's certainly an unsporting act, given the reason.

Not really. BI on a FT can be a natural and inadvertent result of trying to rebound the FT attempt too early. GT a FT is never a natural result of playing the FT.