Free throw violations by both teams, not simultaneous

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I highlighted the Original Situation in this thread in red. And I referenced the appropriate NFHS Rules (Post #5 in the Thread) which apply to the Original Situation.

The OP goes off the rails by positing the Original Situation as a game strategy (Paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 in the OP) when the Rules will not allow it to go any further than an AP Throw-in. This is where the Thread went off of the rails and therefore not germane to the Origninal Situation.

MTD, Sr.

I see... so because some of us responded to paragraphs 3-5, and you, personally, decided paragraphs 3-5 were not "germane" to paragraphs 1-2, the rest of us have somehow transgressed...

Really?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by CoachJW

Thank you for your input. It may be a stupid strategy, it may be a brilliant strategy. Assume now that the shooter is skilled at missing off the rim and the game reaches the "actionless contest" or "impasse" point (shooter keeps missing, opponent keeps violating, re-shoot, repeat). Is the consensus that you would have a warning, then a technical foul on the next violation? Given that you cannot force the shooter to make his shot and end the insanity, how many times would it have to occur before administering the warning?

For me, as soon as I realize they're doing it on purpose, I'm warning.

So, two scenarios.
1. Coach instructs players to do it and I hear him. I'm warning after the first one.
2. No instructions that I can hear from the coach, it may take me a couple of violations to recognize what's going on. I warn them as soon as I recognize it.

They only get one warning.