![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
My opinion is that you always have definite knowledge that some time should have gone off the clock in any case where the clock didn't start -- it is definitely more than 0.0 seconds. So you do have definite knowledge that at least .1 seconds elapsed. In the case of a tap directly out of bounds where the clock didn't start, I'm probably going with 0.3 seconds.
To not do this could penalize the defense in certain situations. What happens when the clock says .5 and this happens with the offense down by 2? I'm not letting the offense another "catch and shoot" attempt. If I don't have definite knowledge that it was .5 seconds and the game is over, then I'm taking between .3 off the clock and only a "tap" can score. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
But, I think the logic is faulty to use NFHS 5-2-5 and declare that at least 0.3 seconds must run off on a deflection that goes immediately OOB. That rule says that 0.3 seconds is the minimal amount of time that a player needs to "catch and release." If there's no control, it could be less. Heck, that's essentially what 5-2-5 says in regards to the try. A player has his hand an inch above the ground over OOB deflects the thrown-in directly to the floor and you'd take off 0.3 seconds? If the player caught the ball and immediately tossed it into the first row, I'd agree with you that at least 0.3 seconds should come off. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Clock management in high school game (no shot clock) | Jorrflv | Basketball | 7 | Thu Feb 02, 2012 03:27pm |
| Play clock and game clock ar the same. | JRutledge | Football | 13 | Wed Oct 19, 2011 08:41am |
| Weird running clock rule? | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 6 | Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:17am |
| Game Clock Rule | SCFLDad | Football | 19 | Fri Nov 21, 2008 02:31pm |
| clock-10 second rule | lpbreeze | Basketball | 9 | Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:50pm |