Wofford/NC State–Gottfried technical foul (Video)

[Adam]

Originally Posted by IUgrad92

As it is being determined that it would be in the best interest for police officers to wear body cams for sake of recording incidents and transparency, I would like to see microphone/recorders inserted into the precision timing devices that the officials wear. Record everything.....

Gottfried says he didn't use profanity prior to the T, everyone here is assuming that he must have used some magic words. Who's ever going to really know what happened and what was said?

Having recordings that conference assignors and university administration can go back, listen to and review could allow them to target and clean-up whichever side of the aisle needs it.

1. The comparison is not valid. No one is going to jail over a technical foul.

2. These are not contradictory. One can use magic words without using profanity.

3. It's not our business what was said, I'm sure it's in Hess' report to Adams.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Adam

1. The comparison is not valid. No one is going to jail over a technical foul.

2. These are not contradictory. One can use magic words without using profanity.

3. It's not our business what was said, I'm sure it's in Hess' report to Adams.

I agree with everything, but I doubt he reports to Adams, he reports to the supervisor of the conference. And I am sure that the situation was addressed in a report like all games at that level likely require.

Peace

[IUgrad92]

Originally Posted by Adam

1. The comparison is not valid. No one is going to jail over a technical foul.

2. These are not contradictory. One can use magic words without using profanity.

3. It's not our business what was said, I'm sure it's in Hess' report to Adams.

1. The comparison is that there are conflicting sides of what happened. Video and/or audio can, in a lot of cases, determine which side is more truthful.

2. What is in Hess' report is Hess' version of what happened. And if Gottfrieds' report of what happened is totally opposite, then what?

I never said it was OUR business. I believe I said it would be something that could be used by conference assignors and school administration. Nobody should have anything to hide. Why would this be such a big deal?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by IUgrad92

1. The comparison is that there are conflicting sides of what happened. Video and/or audio can, in a lot of cases, determine which side is more truthful.

2. What is in Hess' report is Hess' version of what happened. And if Gottfrieds' report of what happened is totally opposite, then what?

I never said it was OUR business. I believe I said it would be something that could be used by conference assignors and school administration. Nobody should have anything to hide. Why would this be such a big deal?

What can't be disputed is that Gottfried was demonstratedly clapping his hands together, an aspect you have failed to address.