Clemson/Arkansas block/charge play (Video)

[zm1283]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

1) PC (someone tell me what the defender did wrong if you have a block)

2) Block, defender moves slightly into A1 once he is airborne. Look for the contact to A1's legs

3) PC

I have the same on all three. #2 was very close but I agree the defender was slightly moving toward A1 as he leaves the floor.

I have no idea how you could have a block on #1.

Some have said no-call on #3. Why is that? Not saying you're wrong, just curious.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

1) Charge.

2) Charge. (Defender's feet were in contact with the court before offensive player went airborne.

3) Charge.

MTD, Sr.

[JRutledge]

All three are charges. Not sure how the one was called a block. The only issue with the first one was the RA, but it appears to not be close, just would have liked a different angle to confirm that part.

Peace

[Pantherdreams]

1)Charge
2) Charge
3) Hard to tell from camera angle about amount of contact but seems like a charge/ no call.

[billyu2]

All three are so close to being identical I would go with the "call similar plays similar ways" philosophy.

[Camron Rust]

1. Charge....but the angle is tough. I might change my mind if given a view from the endline or from midcourt.
2. Block...defender still moving towards shooter after shooter goes up
3. Charge.

[walt]

1. PC
2. PC (I have defender squaring up not moving forward and into)
3. PC

[#olderthanilook]

Charge

Charge

Charge

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

...

2) Charge. (Defender's feet were in contact with the court before offensive player went airborne.
...

MTD, Sr.

That's the only requirement for drawing a charge? Subsequent actions don't matter?