Florida State/Nebraska blarge (Video)

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

... I really do not believe that the Defender that took the charge can be classified as a Secondary Defender in the play because the Offensive Player had been passed his original Defender so as to be classifed as an Offensive Player who was not being defended and therefore a new Defensive Player started to guard him.

MTD, Sr.

Then you're failing to grasp the definition of secondary defender as put forth my NCAA-Men's basketball.

[johnny d]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Then you're failing to grasp the definition of secondary defender as put forth my NCAA-Men's basketball.

Hypothetical question. Assume this contact occurred in the RA, would you call a block because the secondary defender cannot establish initial LGP in the RA, or is the RA not in effect since the player who got the offensive rebound went immediately to the basket, thus eliminating the secondary defender rule?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by johnny d

Hypothetical question. Assume this contact occurred in the RA, would you call a block because the secondary defender cannot establish initial LGP in the RA, or is the RA not in effect since the player who got the offensive rebound went immediately to the basket, thus eliminating the secondary defender rule?

NCAAW: Because the drive started outside the LDB, contact inside the RA cannot be a charge (absent a leading knee, etc.)

[johnny d]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

NCAAW: Because the drive started outside the LDB, contact inside the RA cannot be a charge (absent a leading knee, etc.)

Interesting that NCAA-W does not have the immediate move by the rebounder exception. Also, NCAA-M does not have LDB

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by johnny d

Hypothetical question. Assume this contact occurred in the RA, would you call a block because the secondary defender cannot establish initial LGP in the RA, or is the RA not in effect since the player who got the offensive rebound went immediately to the basket, thus eliminating the secondary defender rule?

Though he made an immediate move, he did have a primary defender on him when he started his move.

I always took the rebounding exception to mean that the first defender encountered was a defender in the RA.

[johnny d]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Though he made an immediate move, he did have a primary defender on him when he started his move.

I already took the rebounding exception to mean that the first defender encountered was a defender in the RA.

I would consider this a secondary defender as well, but I am not sure how I would rule an RA play in this case. The rebounding exception doesn't say anything about how many defenders encountered, it just says there are no secondary defenders when the rebounder makes an immediate move to the basket.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by johnny d

I would consider this a secondary defender as well, but I am not sure how I would rule an RA play in this case. The rebounding exception doesn't say anything about how many defenders encountered, it just says there are no secondary defenders when the rebounder makes an immediate move to the basket.

Would the pump fake and then dribble take away the "immediate move to the basket" part of the NCAA-M interp on this play? Seems like the immediate move would have been him going up for the intial shot, but by pump faking and dribbling away from that defender...??