|
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 06:06pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
With the huge number of rules and their penalties simpler is better.
You may not believe it, but I believe that being able to say "it was a tech, therefore the ball is at mid-court" is simpler. If the rule was or is changed to "the POI is where the throw-in will be," then I'd learn it and that would be that. But at this point why change it for such a rare occasion? The answer to the coach when asked why the rule is like that is simply "you know what? I don't know." And it's not your job to know, either. If that coach is so concerned then let him/her go to the NFHS or whoever. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Video Request: Michigan/Duke, Throw-In Violation, Coach K "T" (Clip Added) | bainsey | Basketball | 22 | Fri Dec 06, 2013 08:57am |
| NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| "Designated Spot" ??? | BillyMac | Basketball | 9 | Mon Nov 16, 2009 08:50am |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
Threaded Mode
