![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
An aside: I was recently discussing a play on the court during a timeout and pointed to the spot of the play. After the game one of my P's told me never to point when discussing a play -- people in the crowd might see it and think we are discussing something because we got it wrong. Is that something I should care about?
|
|
|||
|
To the POINT
No problems when it's done by the book (cf. Faceless Pictograph Guy/Girl):
5-4-1. 5 - Upraised open hand subsequent to whistle for violation 4 - Direction play will resume 1 - Location of throw-in (used to be 2, but picto-graph guy changed last year) A "deal-breaker"? Maybe not with all responsible authorities. But it's promoted as the standard for signaling and just looks good when everyone in the pool does it the same. As to general pointing, no big deal. Pointing to the bench of the team who fouled (the "Accusatory Point") when reporting to the table was branded "verboten" and considered unapproved several years ago. Pointing at the spot of the violation when no approved signal is given is approved by the manual. Nothing impolite about that.
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
|
If T'ing a coach, I will point in the general direction of the coach/bench while looking at the table when I first signal the T. When I report it, I do so as I would any other foul.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Thu Nov 13, 2014 at 09:42am. |
|
|||
|
I think @raytheref is a pretty compelling force here...
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
|
You should obviously do what your assignor wants.
Beyond that, I highly doubt that anyone outside of the refereeing avocation notices how we point. They only (sometimes) notice that we do. As for stronger/weaker, etc. that is all a matter of personal opinion. I agree with Rich. I am way more concerned with having partners who are in position and who consistently make good calls. I don't care how they point.
__________________
Get it right! 1999 (2x), 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2019 |
|
|||
|
I just checked out his Twitter feed. It's like a non-stop stream of camp speak or sales seminar jargon...hard to tell which but potentially it could be both.
Remember folks, coffee is for closers!
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| Point the other way as lead "mechanic" | eyezen | Basketball | 5 | Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17am |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |