|
|||
Dog
DOG and Technical Foul
B1 commits plane violation on throw in in Q1 and DOG recorded in book. a) In Q3 B2 commits plane violation on throw in. b) In Q4 B3 slaps ball away after a goal. Ruling: Team Tech. to Team B. Question: Why would the T not be charged against B2 or B3 who committed the act? |
|
|||
Quote:
#2 Because the book says it's a team T. #3 Have wondered the same thing. Why not a player T?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
|||
It is not a player T because it is usually not a sequence committed solely by that player. It took a prior act by a teammate to get to the situation where the 2nd infraction is penalized with the T. It wouldn't be fair for a player to get an individual T just because they were the 2nd one to cause a delay.
Additionally, delays don't rise to the level of most other things that draw an individual T. Should a player be subject to a DQ that may carry an extra game suspension in many states by getting a T for a DOG along with another one? EDIT: Since all of the delays are lumped together, it would be possible to have a delay by multiple players in some cases (FT huddle). Who would get the T?
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association Last edited by Camron Rust; Sun Oct 19, 2014 at 01:45pm. |
|
|||
Are you thinking of the situation where the clock is running with the clock under 5 seconds left in the game and Team B knocks the ball away in order to get a DOG to stop the clock?
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
Bookmarks |
|
|