Dayton v Stanford (Video)

[JRutledge]

Play #1: I have a charge. The BH gathers but then does not go up immediately. That is a charge all the way IMO.

Play #2: A little embellishment. I would not want to call that kind of play if that was the first time it happened.

Play #3: Looks like a charge to me again. The player does not start his upward motion until after he gathers the ball.

Play #4: Very good call. Elbow clearly outside of his frame and unnatural.

Play #5: It is close, but probably would not call a travel in that situation.

Peace

[Ref16]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Play #1: I have a charge. The BH gathers but then does not go up immediately. That is a charge all the way IMO.

Play #2: A little embellishment. I would not want to call that kind of play if that was the first time it happened.

Play #3: Looks like a charge to me again. The player does not start his upward motion until after he gathers the ball.

Play #4: Very good call. Elbow clearly outside of his frame and unnatural.

Play #5: It is close, but probably would not call a travel in that situation.

Peace

I agree with you on all counts with the exception of play #2.

At first glance it may seem like he was really embellishing (and he did some IMO), but when taking another look at it there were 2 hands placed on the defender and then both arms extended when he pushed off him to get open, so I agree with this call 100%.