The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
NCAA First Four & NIT

I haven't seen either situation personally, but was notified by fellow officials of two situations for which we can hopefully obtain video clips.
1. NCAA game Tenn vs Iowa: FT situation rebounding foul. Arm to the chin deemed a dead ball contact tech.
2. SMU's opening NIT game: correctable error situation. Crew removed the points, but was it following the 2nd dead ball?

Sorry that I don't have more info, such as times during the games. Perhaps someone else can provide.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:16am
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
2. SMU's opening NIT game: correctable error situation. Crew removed the points, but was it following the 2nd dead ball?
This is what I read about this one:

A player was apparently disqualified and the crew didn't realize it. He then scored 2 points. The other team scored and after the throw in, the scorer flagged them down to stop play.

(I'm telling you what I read, NOT what I saw).
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:43am
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Only found video of the correctable error. Some of you may be able to browse to the play (starting at 8:16, CE starts at 7:24 second half) here: ESPN -- UC Irvine vs. SMU
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
This is what I read about this one:

A player was apparently disqualified and the crew didn't realize it. He then scored 2 points. The other team scored and after the throw in, the scorer flagged them down to stop play.

(I'm telling you what I read, NOT what I saw).
That's not a CE.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 85
In Replay: At 8:16 UC Irvine common foul on SMU player (6th Team Foul) then a T on UC Irvine bench, and table says that's number 7. SMU shoots 2 shot technical then shoots 1-1 makes them both. (The 1-1 is the error). Irvine scores and then at 7:16 irvine is fouled and during this (2nd) dead ball they take the 2pts off for a CE. Like bob said. It's not a CE
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triad zebra View Post
In Replay: At 8:16 UC Irvine common foul on SMU player (6th Team Foul) then a T on UC Irvine bench, and table says that's number 7. SMU shoots 2 shot technical then shoots 1-1 makes them both. (The 1-1 is the error). Irvine scores and then at 7:16 irvine is fouled and during this (2nd) dead ball they take the 2pts off for a CE. Like bob said. It's not a CE
That's a completely different play, and it is a CE, but it's too late to fix.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Contact Deadball Technical Foul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
I haven't seen either situation personally, but was notified by fellow officials of two situations for which we can hopefully obtain video clips.

1. NCAA game Tenn vs Iowa: FT situation rebounding foul. Arm to the chin deemed a dead ball contact tech.

Sorry that I don't have more info, such as times during the games. Perhaps someone else can provide.
At 15:48 of the 2nd half, Iowa #15 shoots his last FT.

While the ball is in the air, Tenn #5's elbow hits Iowa #34 in the neck and moves up under the chin. Then the ball passes through the net for a scored FT.

The crew goes to the monitor. They penalize Tenn #5 with a Contact Deadball Technical Foul. A different Iowa player shot the 2 FTs. Iowa was given back the ball at the division line opposite the benches.

Unfortunately, I believe the crew adjudicated this incorrectly.

Tenn #5 should have been penalized with a F1 (since the ball was live during the shot FT). Iowa #34 should have shot the 2 FTs. The ball should have been inbounded by Iowa at the end line underneath the basket.

It'll be interesting to see if the crew advances to the Sweet 16 round next week despite this error.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahoopref View Post
At 15:48 of the 2nd half, Iowa #15 shoots his last FT.

While the ball is in the air, Tenn #5's elbow hits Iowa #34 in the neck and moves up under the chin. Then the ball passes through the net for a scored FT.

The crew goes to the monitor. They penalize Tenn #5 with a Contact Deadball Technical Foul. A different Iowa player shot the 2 FTs. Iowa was given back the ball at the division line opposite the benches.

Unfortunately, I believe the crew adjudicated this incorrectly.

Tenn #5 should have been penalized with a F1 (since the ball was live during the shot FT). Iowa #34 should have shot the 2 FTs. The ball should have been inbounded by Iowa at the end line underneath the basket.

It'll be interesting to see if the crew advances to the Sweet 16 round next week despite this error.
That's exactly what the fellow official who called told me. We both know Mike Reed prides himself on knowing the rules, so we were shocked that his crew botched this. Sad, but if there is any justice in the NCAA evaluation process both Mike and Verne Harris will only work their previously assigned games this weekend and then be done for the 2014 NCAA tourney. Too bad as they are quality officials, but this kind of mistake is unacceptable with access to the TV monitor!!! Ouch.
This contest went to OT as well, so one can certainly make the case that each and every FT mattered.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triad zebra View Post
In Replay: At 8:16 UC Irvine common foul on SMU player (6th Team Foul) then a T on UC Irvine bench, and table says that's number 7. SMU shoots 2 shot technical then shoots 1-1 makes them both. (The 1-1 is the error). Irvine scores and then at 7:16 irvine is fouled and during this (2nd) dead ball they take the 2pts off for a CE. Like bob said. It's not a CE
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
That's a completely different play, and it is a CE, but it's too late to fix.
Thanks to Triad Z for providing us with the details of the situation. I'm now really proud of my referee friend for picking up on this while watching the game. It is semantics, but I will also agree with Bob on how this should be categorized. CE, but too late to correct. Those unmerited FTs now have to stand.

What is with these officials working post-season tournaments kicking simple rules?!?! These were both matters of knowing the basic definitions for a when a dead ball occurs.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
That's exactly what the fellow official who called told me. We both know Mike Reed prides himself on knowing the rules, so we were shocked that his crew botched this.

Sad, but if there is any justice in the NCAA evaluation process both Mike and Verne Harris will only work their previously assigned games this weekend and then be done for the 2014 NCAA tourney.

Too bad as they are quality officials, but this kind of mistake is unacceptable with access to the TV monitor!!! Ouch.


This contest went to OT as well, so one can certainly make the case that each and every FT mattered.
Agree.

Iowa would've gotten 2 FTs regardless but allowing a different player to shoot them (and not the offended player) is unacceptable.

Mike will be in St. Louis this weekend; we'll see what happens next weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 122
If a deadball T was called, why was Iowa given the ball at the division line? NCAA technicals are 2 shots and POI, not 2 shots and the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:57pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwburke94 View Post
If a deadball T was called, why was Iowa given the ball at the division line? NCAA technicals are 2 shots and POI, not 2 shots and the ball.
Not true in NCAA-M for a dead ball contact T
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 21, 2014, 06:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwburke94 View Post
If a deadball T was called, why was Iowa given the ball at the division line? NCAA technicals are 2 shots and POI, not 2 shots and the ball.
I love it when people are so sure that they are right, only to find out otherwise.
Sadly your rules knowledge is no better than that displayed by the crews on these two games.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 28, 2014, 09:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahoopref View Post
At 15:48 of the 2nd half, Iowa #15 shoots his last FT.

While the ball is in the air, Tenn #5's elbow hits Iowa #34 in the neck and moves up under the chin. Then the ball passes through the net for a scored FT.

The crew goes to the monitor. They penalize Tenn #5 with a Contact Deadball Technical Foul. A different Iowa player shot the 2 FTs. Iowa was given back the ball at the division line opposite the benches.

Unfortunately, I believe the crew adjudicated this incorrectly.

Tenn #5 should have been penalized with a F1 (since the ball was live during the shot FT). Iowa #34 should have shot the 2 FTs. The ball should have been inbounded by Iowa at the end line underneath the basket.

It'll be interesting to see if the crew advances to the Sweet 16 round next week despite this error.
(3) Iowa State vs. (7) Connecticut - Verne Harris, Tony Padilla, Mike Reed
Two of them did advance!
Either the NCAA staff in charge of tournament officials didn't recognize this as an incorrect rule application or felt that it wasn't enough to prevent them from moving forward versus the performances of other officials/crews.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 29, 2014, 12:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
(3) Iowa State vs. (7) Connecticut - Verne Harris, Tony Padilla, Mike Reed
Two of them did advance!
Either the NCAA staff in charge of tournament officials didn't recognize this as an incorrect rule application or felt that it wasn't enough to prevent them from moving forward versus the performances of other officials/crews.
Clear some of your PMs. I tried to send you one for their "explanation" but your inbox is too full to send a PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA Rule change? - Question #57 NCAA Test ljudge Football 2 Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:21am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1