NC State at Syracuse ending

[Camron Rust]

#1. Even if there was a foul, the right team got the ball back and there was no need to come in like that after the OOB call.

#2. Great PC (preceeded by a carry).

#3. Basket should have been counted. NO WAY I'm taking away those points.

#4. Good call....even by lead given the fact that the C and T were probably still way behind the play.

[Rob1968]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

#1. Even if there was a foul, the right team got the ball back and there was no need to come in like that after the OOB call.

#2. Great PC (preceeded by a carry).

#3. Basket should have been counted. NO WAY I'm taking away those points.

#4. Good call....even by lead given the fact that the C and T were probably still way behind the play.

I agree on all four. It seems, by the timing/cadence of the call by T, that his call was on #14, and he was convinced that L's call only involved the block by #24. Even so, I'd hopefully leave it alone, as Camron said.

[JetMetFan]

On #4 the C wasn't behind the play at all. He was below the FTLE when the violation took place.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

On #4 the C wasn't behind the play at all. He was below the FTLE when the violation took place.

Yes, he was in good position, and he also called the basket interference. But when it involves a hand going up through the net, I have no problem with the Lead having a whistle.

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

On #4 the C wasn't behind the play at all. He was below the FTLE when the violation took place.

C was in position, but in transition there is no guarantee that he would be, unlike a half-court situation where the off-ball official will nearly always be in position. During transition I think this call is fair game to Lead.

[JRutledge]

1. I have no problem coming in with a foul. If he saw something up top, that is a good call to make.

2. PC Foul all the way.

3. Basket should have counted. The ball handler gathers and never puts the ball back on the floor after being fouled.

4. In transition usually is a time the L can make that call. But he was also already on the end line, so I am not sure why he made that call. But it appeared to be the right call.

Peace

[Toren]

I'm fine with the call, I would not have made it.

PC foul, the C made me laugh, cause he didn't hold up a fist, but he does a funny kind of dance that seems to agree with his partner's call.

From his angle, it would be hard to see if the habitual motion had begun.

The C has the play, his hand is up and I'm sure he's wondering why the Lead has this. Stevie Wonder can see this one.

[Nevadaref]

My thoughts:
1. Leave it alone and the Lead handle this play.

2. Clear PC for the push-off. Nice call and would like to see this made more often.

3. Absolutely in the act of shooting. At the NFHS level, I'm calling this an intentional personal foul. The foul negates an obvious advantageous position by the offensive player.

4. Let the C have this call, which he did. As the Lead, come get it if no call is made by a partner. This is an absolute must have as it is game critical. I don't like the showboating mechanic by the Lead, but I understand why he jumped on this play. The situation in the game (score and time remaining) may have warranted a faster whistle here than any other help situation during a contest.