The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 07:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,029
Why are you using the punch signal for a player control foul?
That's the signal for a team control foul.

If you signal and so does your partner, BY RULE, you report a double foul and resume at POI.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 07:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Why are you using the punch signal for a player control foul?
That's the signal for a team control foul.

If you signal and so does your partner, BY RULE, you report a double foul and resume at POI.
They're only different fouls due to legacy....from the time when the penalties were not the same. Under the current rules, there is nothing about PC that isn't (or can't) be covered by TC. They're both fouls by a player of the team in control of the ball. PC is just specific to one of the players. PC does include the airborne shooter but that clause could just as easily be moved to the TC rule.

As for why someone punches for a PC foul, our state has approved that signal. No one thinks the hand behind the head signal is any good. It is the weakest signal in the book for one of the biggest calls.

Agree on the double foul result.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Tue Feb 11, 2014 at 07:53pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 07:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
The're only different fouls due to legacy....from the time when the penalties were not the same. Under the current rules, there is nothing about PC that isn't (or can't) be covered by PC. They're both fouls by a player of the team in control of the ball. PC is just specific to one of the players. PC does include the airborne shooter but that clause could just as easily be moved to the TC rule.

As for why someone punches for a PC foul, our state has approved that signal. No one thinks the head behind the hand signal is any good. It is the weakest signal in the book for one of the biggest calls.

Agree on the double foul result.
Been one of those days, huh?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 08:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,029
Hey Camron,
Have you seen the NFHS survey posted by BillyMac? The punch signal is listed in part 3.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 09:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Been one of those days, huh?
Yup. At least I can feel good about catching those and a couple more you didn't catch before you posted.

Here is a picture of what I had in mind:

__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Tue Feb 11, 2014 at 09:09pm.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 11, 2014, 09:09pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post

If you signal and so does your partner, BY RULE, you report a double foul and resume at POI.
Could you quote the rule?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 12, 2014, 12:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
Could you quote the rule?
Try fishing for one of the newbies. I'm not biting.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:02am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Try fishing for one of the newbies. I'm not biting.
Actually, the OP brings up a serious question. The case play now reads that one official rules this and the other rules that.

In the OP the officials made conflicting rulings. We know this because one made the signal and the other told us what his ruling was. Why are they not obligated to report both fouls regardless of what signals were or were not made? I have never heard an answer to this question, satisfactory or not.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:15am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,583
And you are the only one not understanding this too.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 12, 2014, 03:38am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
There's nothing to understand. I thought Nevada was scolding the OP for walking away from what was described as a partial signal. I thought the OP might want an explanation of how much is too much, and when a signal is binding, and why. I know I do.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 12, 2014, 08:16am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
There's nothing to understand. I thought Nevada was scolding the OP for walking away from what was described as a partial signal. I thought the OP might want an explanation of how much is too much, and when a signal is binding, and why. I know I do.
Ask your supervisors and see what they say.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 12, 2014, 08:23am
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
There's nothing to understand. I thought Nevada was scolding the OP for walking away from what was described as a partial signal. I thought the OP might want an explanation of how much is too much, and when a signal is binding, and why. I know I do.
As you know, the "ruling" is made whenever an official thinks in his brain block or charge. Unless jeremy341a's brain accidentally made him signal PC instead of block, you gotta report that blarge.

Otherwise just tell the coach your brain made you do the wrong signal. He'll understand.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I must be bad luck NCASAUmp Softball 3 Fri Oct 12, 2007 05:28pm
Wish me luck! refnrev Basketball 9 Wed Dec 06, 2006 07:26pm
Wish me luck! QuebecRef87 Basketball 1 Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:16pm
No luck John Crow Basketball 14 Tue Jan 23, 2001 11:12am
Good luck...... Larry Gonski Football 0 Sun Nov 07, 1999 07:59pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1