Did They Get This Right?

Scratch85 · #1 (**permalink**) Mon Dec 16, 2013, 03:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Maeder

This is dead ball contact, so it would have to be a technical foul as it can't be ignored.

Intentional or Flagrant. Not Technical.

Ed Maeder · #2 (**permalink**) Mon Dec 16, 2013, 03:32pm

Read the OP. It was after the whistle that the throw down occurred. Dead ball contact is ignored or a technical. It would fall under intentional contact while the ball is dead. Therefore a technical foul and administered as such.

JRutledge · #3 (**permalink**) Mon Dec 16, 2013, 03:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scratch85

Intentional or Flagrant. Not Technical.

It is still a Technical foul. You can have Intentional and Flagrant Technical fouls. But by rule all fouls during dead ball that are flagrant or intentional in nature are administered as a Technical foul. And that will change who can shoot the FTs and where the ball is put in play after the FTs are taken.

Peace

Adam · #4 (**permalink**) Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scratch85

Intentional or Flagrant. Not Technical.

Technically, it's an intentional technical foul.

bob jenkins · #5 (**permalink**) Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:19pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scratch85

Intentional or Flagrant. Not Technical.

All fouls are either Personal or Technical.

Fouls may have one (or more) modifiers -- Intentional, Flagran, Common, Double, ...

This was an Intentional Technical foul.