|
|||
Administrative Technicals
The thread concerning Admin T's made me think of this situation and I didn't want to hijack the other thread. Sorry if it seems redundant.
Middle of the 2nd quarter A1 commits a foul and it is noted that A1 is not in the book. Admin Tech against Team A is issued. B1 shoots the first of the two FT's. The table then notifies the officials that B1 is not in the book. Admin Tech against Team B is issued. My questions are; 1) Do we always shoot admin T's and administer them in the order they occurred? (no cancelling as in Double T's) 2) Does the above scenario end with a division line throw in by Team A? |
|
|||
1. Unless you can find a way that a double T is considered a foul against opponents at approximately the same time for administrative violations, then you cannot have both fouls cancel out as in a definition of a double foul or T of any kind.
2. Yes, Team A should get the ball at the division line. The T on team B was noticed after the T on Team A was being administered. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Based on your answer to (1), it would not change any thing in my scenario if the T on Team B was noticed prior to administering the T on Team A. Correct? |
|
|||
I do not see how an administrative T can ever be a double foul by definition. So you administer this fouls in the order in which they took place.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Neither team provides their rosters/starters by the 10 minute mark? At some moment in the game, the table tells you that neither A1 nor B1, both in the game, is in the book. |
|
|||
The first is "offset" in NCAAW. There's a specific case on it. I seem to recall one in FED, but I don't have the books handy today.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Camron Rust; Mon Dec 16, 2013 at 07:04pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
And I looked this up and still do not see any support that suggests you can call a double foul for his kind of situation. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Administrative T | Rich | Basketball | 9 | Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:37pm |
Administrative T or not? | Zoochy | Basketball | 14 | Sat Dec 26, 2009 11:27pm |
Administrative "T" | rainmaker | Basketball | 15 | Tue Dec 07, 2004 01:11pm |
Unsporting or Administrative "T" | Smoothieking | Basketball | 12 | Tue Jan 06, 2004 04:18pm |
administrative technical | jr | Basketball | 7 | Mon Dec 15, 2003 03:26pm |